Then they should ask for an option to pay Apple a fee based on number of installs of their software. Apple getting a 30% cut from their in app sales is as fair as them giving the product for free and selling inside it.The entire idea behind this is ridiculous to begin with. Why should Apple get a 30% cut from something you sold inside your app to a customer?
Imagine if you bought a game on Steam and Microsoft butted in and said "Hey bud, give me my cut now." Ah, what's that, bought something on Amazon? Better give Microsoft their cut.
Why is it fair? Why does Apple deserve anything?Then they should ask for an option to pay Apple a fee based on number of installs of their software. Apple getting a 30% cut from their in app sales is as fair as them giving the product for free and selling inside it.The entire idea behind this is ridiculous to begin with. Why should Apple get a 30% cut from something you sold inside your app to a customer?
Imagine if you bought a game on Steam and Microsoft butted in and said "Hey bud, give me my cut now." Ah, what's that, bought something on Amazon? Better give Microsoft their cut.
Does Ford own and manage the petrol station where you buy your gas?Why is it fair? Why does Apple deserve anything?
Should Ford get a 30% cut on the money I spend on putting gas in my truck?
Why is it fair? Why does Apple deserve anything?
Should Ford get a 30% cut on the money I spend on putting gas in my truck?
Does Apple own and manage fortnite?Does Ford own and manage the petrol station where you buy your gas?Why is it fair? Why does Apple deserve anything?
Should Ford get a 30% cut on the money I spend on putting gas in my truck?
No, but it does own and manage the Apple Store.Does Apple own and manage fortnite?Does Ford own and manage the petrol station where you buy your gas?Why is it fair? Why does Apple deserve anything?
Should Ford get a 30% cut on the money I spend on putting gas in my truck?
This argument is going in the wrong direction. Fords run on the same kind of gas as any other car. Now, imagine they required a special kind of fuel, whose formula Ford patented. Under current laws, it would be quite logical that if a third party wants to produce Ford's fuel than it should pay Ford a license fee for its patent - and Ford would have every right to revoke it if they breech the contract.Not, but it does own and manage the Apple Store.Does Apple own and manage fortnite?Does Ford own and manage the petrol station where you buy your gas?Why is it fair? Why does Apple deserve anything?
Should Ford get a 30% cut on the money I spend on putting gas in my truck?
Apple's users are retarded. They were able to accept that not having headphones on phone was not only great, but having to buy airpods was even better. I still wait for the day Apple start selling iPhone without battery charger, force them to buy one and still have users praising their idea.
Because the most rich and powerful globohomo corporations should be held responsible when they abuse their dominant position to push anti-consumer practices.I just don't understand why Apple should be forced to allow on its store a piece of software of a company that doesn't want to comply with its terms of service.
Okay, Bernie Sanders.Because the most rich and powerful globohomo corporations should be held responsible when they abuse their dominant position to push anti-consumer practices.
Okay, I fully agree with you on this.Because the most rich and powerful globohomo corporations should be held responsible when they abuse their dominant position to push anti-consumer practices.I just don't understand why Apple should be forced to allow on its store a piece of software of a company that doesn't want to comply with its terms of service.
Okay, Bernie Sanders.Because the most rich and powerful globohomo corporations should be held responsible when they abuse their dominant position to push anti-consumer practices.
Trust busting is as American as baseball and apple pie.Okay, I fully agree with you on this.Because the most rich and powerful globohomo corporations should be held responsible when they abuse their dominant position to push anti-consumer practices.I just don't understand why Apple should be forced to allow on its store a piece of software of a company that doesn't want to comply with its terms of service.
I didn't know you where a fellow comrade, rusty. I will vote for you in the next Favorite Codex Communist pool.
Because the most rich and powerful globohomo corporations should be held responsible when they abuse their dominant position to push anti-consumer practices.I just don't understand why Apple should be forced to allow on its store a piece of software of a company that doesn't want to comply with its terms of service.
My face when I was supposed to lead humanity to a brighter future, but I wasted my life designing videogames:kwa cellular/internet bills are what happens when you dont apply anti monopoly/competition laws. Its not about communism. You guyz know... its almost if it would be good to have balance between capitalism and communism
Trump supporter. Accuses others of bootlicking authoritarians. The irony. It's okay, we'll keep your communist leanings a secret from the poliboard.Trust busting is as American as baseball and apple pie.
If you enjoy bootlicking, be my guest.
Windows isn't a closed system though, nor is it tied to specific hardware. Game consoles would be a much closer analogy here - and something tells me, MS controls the X-box market just as much as Apple.
Okay, Bernie Sanders.Because the most rich and powerful globohomo corporations should be held responsible when they abuse their dominant position to push anti-consumer practices.Trust busting is as American as baseball and apple pie.Okay, I fully agree with you on this.Because the most rich and powerful globohomo corporations should be held responsible when they abuse their dominant position to push anti-consumer practices.I just don't understand why Apple should be forced to allow on its store a piece of software of a company that doesn't want to comply with its terms of service.
I didn't know you where a fellow comrade, rusty. I will vote for you in the next Favorite Codex Communist pool.
If you enjoy bootlicking, be my guest.
Communist rusty confirmed. I knew all that Trump-shit he posted on the poliboard was just trolling for trolling sake.
I've seen this defended: https://imgur.com/pUJhCB7 . Yeah it's exactly how it looks, can't use the mouse while charging.Apple's users are retarded. They were able to accept that not having headphones on phone was not only great, but having to buy airpods was even better. I still wait for the day Apple start selling iPhone without battery charger, force them to buy one and still have users praising their idea.
I like it how for Amis any kind of governmental control over market or social support is "MUH KOMMUNISM!11 RED MENACE!". Like, German worker of early XX century had more social support and protection than average Ami worker today, with Kaiserreich being a fucking monarchy.kwa cellular/internet bills are what happens when you dont apply anti monopoly/competition laws. Its not about communism. You guyz know... its almost if it would be good to have balance between capitalism and communism