Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
How do you explain that 1% thing then?
The massive majority of people never got to the romance because it's at essentially the end of the early access after you've done most of the content.
 

hell bovine

Arcane
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
2,711
Location
Secret Level
I'm in the 1% camp, but Gale would be my guess as to who the fangirls would go for. And while I think straight guys aren't such a minority as you make them to be, I think female gamers are more likely to try romances in cRPGs.
How do you explain that 1% thing then? I'm also not saying they are a minority, just not such a huuuuuuuuuuuuuuugely overwhelming majority that one would think or would try to pawn off.
Huge majority over what? Looking at the news, Shadowheart was very close. That is two npcs that I'd label as the typical straight option. Which to me implies that you have as many girls playing as you have guys.

Or it might be also the easiest romance not to screw up. Jaheira's was notoriously buggy in BG2, from what I recall. At this point the next step is going to be your character having to fend off npcs with a broomstick, because players will complain about romances being "too difficult", and so the devs will want to make sure you can't fail in your dating simulator.
 

Lacrymas

Arcane
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
18,000
Pathfinder: Wrath
Huge majority over what? Looking at the news, Shadowheart was very close. That is two npcs that I'd label as the typical straight option. Which to me implies that you have as many girls playing as you have guys.
Yes, that's what I'm also saying. I'm saying that it's surprising the vast majority aren't straight guys. Let's say for the sake argument Lae'zel is at 30% (less than Gale and Shadowheart, the most romanced), that leaves the other tiny percentages to Astarion and Wyll. That means that straight guys are at most 60ish%, which is surprising, not as overwhelming a majority as one would think. I don't believe Lae'zel is at 30%, though, she doesn't strike me as popular among the normie straights.

Or the other possibility is that very few people make it to the end of the EA, where the romance takes place (although we don't know what they think of as "romance" in this context. Is the sex scene that?), so we don't have a way to extrapolate demographics like this.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
I'm going to guess that only bigger fans made it to the end of the EA which includes fangirls. They likely make an overall tiny portion of the actual playerbase.
 

Shinros

Learned
Joined
May 27, 2020
Messages
172
Or the fact the women are unappealing in the game. One doesn't like you asking basic questions and the other wants to dom you unless you pass an intimidation check and acts confrontational every conversation. Also you have to reach near the end of the EA to get the scene in the first place. Leaving mainly, fangirls and gay men who are ultra fans of the characters who decided to reach the end.
 

Lacrymas

Arcane
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
18,000
Pathfinder: Wrath
Shadowheart is the second most popular, so the theory of she being unappealing doesn't seem to hold water in this specific context.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
Shadowheart is the second most popular, so the theory of she being unappealing doesn't seem to hold water in this specific context.
I can see why a lot of men wouldn't be interested in Shadowheart, I'd assume it's the reason RPGs with romances usually have quite a few to pick from.
 

Shrimp

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 7, 2019
Messages
1,057
I imagine the companion romance rates might also be slightly affected by how frequently they are included in the player parties.
Shadowheart is both a cleric and the first companion most players come across. I imagine she's significantly more likely to be included in a player's party compared to someone like Lae'Zel or Wyll who are found later on in the early access.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
I imagine the companion romance rates might also be slightly affected by how frequently they are included in the player parties.
Shadowheart is both a cleric and the first companion most players come across. I imagine she's significantly more likely to be included in a player's party compared to someone like Lae'Zel or Wyll who are found later on in the early access.
Good point. I wonder how many people didn't bring Gale along with them?
A wizard(or similar arcane caster) is nearly a necessity in any party, and unless you're playing a wizard yourself...
 
Self-Ejected

Joseph Stalin

Totally not Auraculum
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
796
So, what's the issue with their being some lingering Bhaalspawn around? Even in ToB when you defeat Amelyssan, Solar only says that the overwhelming majority of Bhaal's essence is possessed by you. Having 100% of it wasn't necessary, hence Amelyssan proceeding with the ritual.

That's because some moron writing "A Murder in Baldur's Gate" stated that Abdel and Viekang were the last two Bhaalspawn, not taking into account:
1. Imoen
2. Sarevok (?)
3. Any and all survivors from Saradush.
4. Bhaalspawn from other regions in the world and/or other Player Characters (Bhaalspawn were a playable kit/background in PnP).
5. And most importantly - FUCKING CHILDREN of Bhaalspawn, who are automatically Bhaalspawn themselves, which means that the essence of Bhaal can be replicated.

I hope, really do, that Larian put the ALL THE BHAALSPAWN ARE DEAD line for the same purpose CHARNAME'S biography had YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT YOUR FATHER. A giant foreshadowing. And if the leak I posted before is true, this may be the case.
 

d1r

Busin 0 Wizardry Alternative Neo fanatic
Patron
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,618
Location
Germany
I want to see Imoen in Baldur's Gate 3, tbh.

And also
Shar-Teel
 
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
2,540
Location
The Present
Joseph Stalin I understand now. Another consequence of canonizing glorified fan fiction, it appears. Imoen gives up her essence if you take her to the throne. She would also be dead by BG3 if you didn't take her, though she could have had a kid I suppose. Her children would be diluted, if we take a traditional view of heredity. Sarevok no longer had any essence after PC killed him, even after being resurrected. Saradush doesn't really have survivors other than (potentially) Viekang. The city gets razed and butchered by Yaga Shura's army. Still, it's fine to assume that not every Bhaalspawn ended up in Saradush. It seems like a really dumb oversight.
 

d1r

Busin 0 Wizardry Alternative Neo fanatic
Patron
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,618
Location
Germany
Joseph Stalin I understand now. Another consequence of canonizing glorified fan fiction, it appears. Imoen gives up her essence if you take her to the throne. She would also be dead by BG3 if you didn't take her, though she could have had a kid I suppose. Her children would be diluted, if we take a traditional view of heredity. Sarevok no longer had any essence after PC killed him, even after being resurrected. Saradush doesn't really have survivors other than (potentially) Viekang. The city gets razed and butchered by Yaga Shura's army. Still, it's fine to assume that not every Bhaalspawn ended up in Saradush. It seems like a really dumb oversight.

Do wonder what the Bioware devs think about this book. Seeing their story getting so brutally raped by some massive moron, who should have kept writing horny fan fiction for himself.
 

Chippy

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 5, 2018
Messages
6,066
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I want to see Imoen in Baldur's Gate 3, tbh.

And also
Shar-Teel
I'd like to see Sarevok, but it ain't happening. :dealwithit:

At this point there seems to be nobody that can write to the quality of David Gaider in BG2, and nobody is interested in using the original writers of BG1. So I'm glad none of the original characters are being sodomized by BG3. I know Minsc was popular (took years for him to grow on me) at which point I realised he was a uniquely written character - and I'm pretty confident that nobody has been able to write him as well in the two or so games and comics I've seen him placed within after BG1 & 2.

Better if they just leave the characters where they are really. Somebody mentioned Viconia being a drow dom in BG2: well she can take out the whip and cat 'o nine tails to my BG character any day of the week if I had to choose between her writing quality in BG2 to Amber fucktard Scott, or any other modern writers I've seen today.
 
Self-Ejected

Joseph Stalin

Totally not Auraculum
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
796
I see nothing that would contradict Imoen being dead.

Bhaalspawn are biologically immortal, or at least very long lived. So her dying of old age is unlikely, considering that:
1. She's younger than Abdel.
2. She's a mage.

EDIT: Baldur's Gate I, Volrath, during CHARNAME'S first conversation with Imoen. She states that she's younger than you.
 
Self-Ejected

Joseph Stalin

Totally not Auraculum
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
796
Joseph Stalin I understand now. Another consequence of canonizing glorified fan fiction, it appears. Imoen gives up her essence if you take her to the throne. She would also be dead by BG3 if you didn't take her, though she could have had a kid I suppose. Her children would be diluted, if we take a traditional view of heredity. Sarevok no longer had any essence after PC killed him, even after being resurrected. Saradush doesn't really have survivors other than (potentially) Viekang. The city gets razed and butchered by Yaga Shura's army. Still, it's fine to assume that not every Bhaalspawn ended up in Saradush. It seems like a really dumb oversight.

1. There is no indication of children having a "diluted" essence.
2. You meet Bhaalspawn outside Saradush (the goblin, kobold etc.). Also, as you've stated yourself, it's impossible for EVERY Bhaalspawn from the entire continent to converge on a single city.
3. Sarevok gets a small piece of Bhaal's essence from Imoen. He states outright that it isn't enough to fuel his former powers, but still.
4. Where did you get that info that Imoen gave away her essence. Does anyone have a screenshot? I can't for the life of me remember this.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom