Robber Baron
Savant
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Messages
- 916
Why even bother with preloads? By the time they decrypt you'll download the game twice
They are using street cred as reputation.Speaking of street cred, what on earth are they smoking with that? Purchases are usually gated by how much money you can give the vendor, not that+ how badass you are. Really bad system.
I consider it to mean a game with lots of scripted sequences, narrative-driven, fully voiced, with token impact of the player's character build choices, so as to not make it difficult to play for those who would make bad build choices. I think it's specific enough as a definition. So, now it means something.interactive movie.
You repeated the same term like three or four times already in the last few pages. You like it, but there is no need to flood with it. Mostly because it means nothing.
Serious question - is anything even known about Starfield?
See that moon over there? You can climb it.
I consider it to mean a game with lots of scripted sequences, narrative-driven, fully voiced, with token impact of the player's character build choices, so as to not make it difficult to play for those who would make bad build choices. I think it's specific enough as a definition. So, now it means something.
The question for me is, are modern action RPGs even comprehensible by audience which has not tried Witcher 3. It's the next step in the evolution of Action RPGs after Skyrim.
I don't really care what is considered a classic here, or by whom.I consider it to mean a game with lots of scripted sequences, narrative-driven, fully voiced, with token impact of the player's character build choices, so as to not make it difficult to play for those who would make bad build choices. I think it's specific enough as a definition. So, now it means something.
That's a start. But since your "definition" can be aplied to many RPGs that are considered classics even here, it still means nothing.
The games you're thinking of aren't anything like this. CP2077 is part of this new peculiar breed of "games" where every time the player gets to interact with the world is in a cutscene. The "game" is just a sequence of cutscenes in which the player gets to perform some minimal interaction. This is why the GTA/Rockstar comparison is fully warranted. In a Rockstar game all you do is explore the world until you start a quest, and then an extended cutscene plays, and you get to shoot some enemies. All you're really doing is going from cutscene to cutscene, much like a movie. Except at least the older GTA games have a unique charm to them, whereas CP2077 is just a bunch of cringey shit.I consider it to mean a game with lots of scripted sequences, narrative-driven, fully voiced, with token impact of the player's character build choices, so as to not make it difficult to play for those who would make bad build choices. I think it's specific enough as a definition. So, now it means something.
That's a start. But since your "definition" can be aplied to many RPGs that are considered classics even here, it still means nothing.
Serious question - is anything even known about Starfield?
https://www.pcgamer.com/starfield-bethesda-pc-rpg/Starfield is Bethesda's first original RPG in 25 years, and it's set in space.
Personally, I blame KojimaThe "game" is just a sequence of cutscenes in which the player gets to perform some minimal interaction.
The question for me is, are modern action RPGs even comprehensible by audience which has not tried Witcher 3. It's the next step in the evolution of Action RPGs after Skyrim.
Skyrim and Fallout 3/NV were the reason why I didn't even look at The Witcher 3. I don't have enough time to roam around an open world like that anymore ! I hope that Cyberpunk is a little more constrained and deeper, like e.g. Bloodlines...
The "game" is just a sequence of cutscenes in which the player gets to perform some minimal interaction.
The games you're thinking of aren't anything like this. CB2077 is part of this new peculiar breed of "games" where every time the player gets to interact with the world is in a cutscene. The "game" is just a sequence of cutscenes in which the player gets to perform some minimal interaction. This is why the GTA/Rockstar comparison is fully warranted. In a Rockstar game all you do is explore the world until you start a quest, and then an extended cutscene plays, and you get to shoot some enemies. All you're really doing is going from cutscene to cutscene, much like a movie. Except at least the older GTA games have a unique charm to them, whereas CB2077 is just a bunch of cringey shit.
Following this logic, in every game you are just going from cutscene to cutscene. If there is a cutscene in the beginning, and one at the end, the whole game is about just going from one cutscene to the other. The important thing is what do you do between the cutscenes. If it is good gameplay, the game is good, if it is not, it is probably bad (unless it is saved by some other factor).All you're really doing is going from cutscene to cutscene,
Good to know that you already know what a 100 hour long game offers just from looking at a few trailer. CP might as well have the charm and quality GTA has.Except at least the older GTA games have a unique charm to them, whereas CB2077 is just a bunch of cringey shit.
It definitely doesn't. We've seen more than enough to conclude that this will be a highly cringeworthy story with failed attempts at humor and romance, much like your average Marvel or DC movie.Good to know that you already know what a 100 hour long game offers just from looking at a few trailer. CP might as well have the charm and quality GTA has.
Codex hates CDPR just as much as Resetera. Trannies and closet homosexuals coming together as one, in an ultimate showing of fringe weirdo unity. Warms my cold, withered heart.
Codex hates CDPR just as much as Resetera. Trannies and closet homosexuals coming together as one, in an ultimate showing of fringe weirdo unity. Warms my cold, withered heart.
Serious question - is anything even known about Starfield?
See that moon over there? You can climb it.Serious question - is anything even known about Starfield?
And that's a retarded take of Blade Runner if I ever saw one. Brain still hurting from that retardation Tron.An Internet reactionary's vision of cyberpunk is basically Roy Batty-esque Aryan ubermenschen fighting it out on neon-slicked rooftops while uttering profound existential monologues, ignoring (and implicitly disapproving of) the degeneracy that must be rampant in the streets below.