Fenix
Arcane
are you chinese?
The one who write descriptions on Alibaba to boot, in Russian! Such cringe.
Last edited:
are you chinese?
Golly, this is an anglophobic forum, innit?
He had threesaneoptions:
- Do nothing <- This is what we thought he did
- Consult a lawyer and issue a statement. <- This would have suppressed the opportunity to gather evidence (people get scared when real lawyers are involved, they delete their tweets, etc.)
- Consult a lawyer but do not issue a statement. Let your accuser gloat and posture on twitter while documenting everything.
3 is the correct choice.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." ― Napoleon Bonaparte
s I said one hundred times, this is seen as an admission of guilt in any western civil judicial or societal system, whether you like it or not.
Golly, this is an anglophobic forum, innit?
It's an equal opportunity phobic forum.
We hate limeys, micks, hebes, fat dagos, niggers, honkies, chinks, you name it.
anyone know if this guy is objective or has an agenda? /haven't watched the video yet
anyone know if this guy is objective or has an agenda? /haven't watched the video yet
anyone know if this guy is objective or has an agenda? /haven't watched the video yet
anyone know if this guy is objective or has an agenda? /haven't watched the video yet
anyone know if this guy is objective or has an agenda? /haven't watched the video yet
anyone know if this guy is objective or has an agenda? /haven't watched the video yet
Listened to the conclusion, he's coming at it neutrally but has a very pessimistic assessment because of the burden of proof required of Avellone.
I honestly have no idea who to believe with this stuff, as every lawyer seems to have different opinion of his chances.
That's because we're talking about two different things. More than half the people who have been replying to me are replying to a strawman their schizo minds created and their replies have nothing to do with my posts. Even after I specifically clarified what I was talking about, I still got people talking to me about the criminal justice system and how "the evidence against klarissa exonerated Avellone", as if that has anything at all to do with what I said.1.) There was very few evidence brought to the public, just supposed witnesses. The only evidence brought forth of Avellone's weird behavior was the message screencap. Despite there not being much evidence and the allegations being relatively empty, Avellone chose not to defend himself, and, as I said one hundred times, this is seen as an admission of guilt in any western civil judicial or societal system, whether you like it or not. I already posted an analogy to evidence this before, but 2 people chose to hilariously misinterpret it and pivot instead of engaging with it honestly.
Well this line of thinking seems to be awfully similar to the whole “if you were raped why haven’t you gone to the police right away” type argumentation that is seen as increasingly abhorrent in any western judicial system though.
I mean its 2021 so why not just respond by saying “I was in such a shock that I couldn’t really do anything until now.” It certainly does seem to work for all kinds of accusers pretty well.
There's various reasons why someone won't go to the police immediately after a rape - the humiliation and destruction of their ego being the most prominent ones. There's not many reasons to not defend yourself on twitter when accused of sexual harassment and immediately submitting to them though.
That's USA we're speaking of. I bet there're dozens of charities which will gladly pay lawyer costs for poor victims of sexual predator.The thing is, those thots are probably broke as fuck. If there's any lawyer here, I'd like to know how expensive is it to defend against a libel case, assuming it isn't immediately dismissed.
He had three sane options:
- Do nothing <- This is what we thought he did
- Consult a lawyer and issue a statement. <- This would have suppressed the opportunity to gather evidence (people get scared when real lawyers are involved, they delete their tweets, etc.)
- Consult a lawyer but do not issue a statement. Let your accuser gloat and posture on twitter while documenting everything.
3 is the correct choice.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." ― Napoleon Bonaparte
He had three sane options:
- Do nothing <- This is what we thought he did
- Consult a lawyer and issue a statement. <- This would have suppressed the opportunity to gather evidence (people get scared when real lawyers are involved, they delete their tweets, etc.)
- Consult a lawyer but do not issue a statement. Let your accuser gloat and posture on twitter while documenting everything.
3 is the correct choice.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." ― Napoleon Bonaparte
It was absolutely not the correct choice. Do remember that around the same time Chris' accusers "came forward", pretty much the same thing happened to Seven Pesos Pedro. Except he's the one who handled it correctly. He immediately went in full offense mode, used all of his public platforms to vehemently deny the accusations and defend himself, got lawyered up within a day or two and started threatening/throwing lawsuits at his accusers.
Fast forward a year, Enraged Enrique's reputation is still 99.9% intact*, his career didn't take so much as a scratch and almost no one even mentions that case anymore. Compare that to Chris who chose to beg and grovel (or strategically do nothing as you claim ), who has been dropped and abandoned by p. much all of his "friends" and is entirely unemployable in the vidya industry because of his reputation as a sex molester.
*he did get banned from RetardEra, but it's, you know, RetardEra (although that may have been because of his "transphobic" review of The Last of Us 2, I can't remember)
I think that you are mixing Avellone's ex-girlfiend Jackie and Jacqui Collins.
A great deal of good modern games come from Eastern Europe, ex-USSR countries, Turkey. Sure many developers would be glad to work with MCA.