Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Savegame limitations?

Should there be any savegame limitations in RPG games?


  • Total voters
    131
  • Poll closed .
Self-Ejected

Shitty Kitty

Self-Ejected
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
556

Harthwain

Magister
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
4,688
You can't remove the possibility to save only to pander compulsive savescummers à la Rusty.
You can. The question is whether it is worth the effort and what effect does it have (how people play the game) as a result.

There is a limit: beyond a certain pathologic point, it is not a problem that should be addressed and solved by developers, in particular if the solution is the removal of a QoL feature that affects everyone.
That is an opinion, not a fact. Just because one developer decided not to go too deep on limiting saves (implementing an optional ironman option) doesn't mean this is some sort of universal truth.

2) Another point is the claim, that I have seen in this thread, that savescumming is the cause of the decline in gaming, with the corollary that if the developers are allowed to limit the possibility to save, the game design will improve, in particular in better and significative C&C. We see instead from the observations of this developer that it could be exactly the opposite. In order to implement the ironman mode he had to tone down the C&C, in particular the consequences that lead to a game over, basically reducing the difficulty of the game.
I would argue that playing Battle Brothers on Ironman is much more difficult than playing Battle Brothers with saves despite toning it down, because Ironman actively punishes your mistakes by forcing you to live with the consequences, while the other option does not (meaning you can reload and as a result never have to suffer negative outcomes).

You can realize that also games like Darksouls (the epitome of "hard" game) have a toned down C&C: you cannot lose the game or deadlock yourself, if you lose a battle, you just respawn and the world reset (and IMO this is just a boring mechanics, but this is another topic).
How is respawning different from reloading in this regard? If anything respawning is worse as usually respawning carries certain penalties with it (loss of experience, for example), while reloading does not (unless it is a resource).

On the other hand this randomness is completely at odd with the other game mechanics: the permadeath. This is exactly what the developer was saying: i.e. that the randomness should be toned down in order to have a viable implementation of the ironman mode. For this reason I see the roguelikes as short pastimes (like card game solitaries, where luck is part of the charm) but fail to see them as long winded RPGs.
I think you're mixing up combat-related RNG with things such as level generation, item placements and other variables that do not impact combat directly.
 

Nifft Batuff

Prophet
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
3,169
That is an opinion, not a fact. Just because one developer decided not to go too deep on limiting saves (implementing an optional ironman option) doesn't mean this is some sort of universal truth.
Obviously. But is a very reasonable opinion.

I would argue that playing Battle Brothers on Ironman is much more difficult than playing Battle Brothers with saves despite toning it down, because Ironman actively punishes your mistakes by forcing you to live with the consequences, while the other option does not (meaning you can reload and as a result never have to suffer negative outcomes).
Exactly. The difficulty is higher, but only by the presence of ironman save mechanics. The rest of the gameplay is easier. I don't see any particular improvement in this.
How is respawning different from reloading in this regard? If anything respawning is worse as usually respawning carries certain penalties with it (loss of experience, for example), while reloading does not (unless it is a resource).

Exactly. There are no permanent consequences in the game (apart from eliminating specific bosses). You can also grind mindlessy the mob around the bonfire to acquire experience points. Dark Souls has one of the most boring game mechanics IMO, but this is topic for another discussion.

I think you're mixing up combat-related RNG with things such as level generation, item placements and other variables that do not impact combat directly.
Randomness in level layout (including number, placement and monster types and items) can give rise to spikes in difficulty and "unfair" situations.
 
Last edited:

Harthwain

Magister
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
4,688
Randomness in level layout (including number, placement and monster types and items) can give rise to spikes in difficulty and "unfair" situations.
While fluctuations can occurr it is far fetched to claim that "randomness is completely at odd with the other game mechanics: the permadeath". Games are typically made with the intention of the players being able to complete them, so the developers will naturally try to set the difficulty at a level they deem appropriate. Or make sure there are a few difficulty levels for players to pick from. Or even a "set it up yourself" difficulty setting. Roguelites can be even more forgiving than roguelikes by allowing you to upgrade yourself with some form of meta currency should you fail your run. There are a few instances where games adjust their difficulty on the fly, depending how the player is doing (but not so much that playing badly will make you win).
 

Van-d-all

Erudite
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
1,557
Location
Standin' pretty. In this dust that was a city.
Simply minimize the opportunities to savescumm. Make out of combat encounters deterministic, and combat encounters short enough to disallow saving. Saving during combat sucks all fun from those encounters IMO, because risk/reward management is an essential part of them. Allow retrying the entire fights to avoid borderline failures, but let probability keep settling the entire encounter around the expected value of combatant skills etc. Players shouldn't expect to ace every fight with trickshot crits savescumming or not.
 

Demo.Graph

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 17, 2018
Messages
990
Z7HeRxU.png

The Thread
 

fantadomat

Arcane
Edgy Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
37,083
Location
Bulgaria
Thank god that devs don't care about the opinions of such weirdos,because they are niche and nobody cares about them.
 

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,205
Location
Ingrija
Simply minimize the opportunities to savescumm. Make out of combat encounters deterministic, and combat encounters short enough to disallow saving. Saving during combat sucks all fun from those encounters IMO, because risk/reward management is an essential part of them. Allow retrying the entire fights to avoid borderline failures, but let probability keep settling the entire encounter around the expected value of combatant skills etc. Players shouldn't expect to ace every fight with trickshot crits savescumming or not.

Gambling is fun. And gambling where you can rig the outcome is funnest.
 

Can't handle the bacon

Guest
Yeah, RPG devs have been on top of their game the last couple of decades, makes perfect sense to appeal to their wisdom and authority.

rating_retarded.png
rating_retarded.png
rating_retarded.png
 

Lonely Vazdru

Pimp my Title
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,656
Location
Agen
jafuck.jpg


I would never have won this fight (and there are five more enemies to kill) without a bit of reloading. Good luck to those who get in this kind of situation in an "iron man" game. What really helped me win though was retreating and re-entering the sector twice durig the fight. And as legit a move as it may be, it still felt more like cheating than a couple of well placed reloads.
 
Last edited:

Ol' Willy

Arcane
Zionist Agent Vatnik
Joined
May 3, 2020
Messages
24,568
Location
Reichskommissariat Russland ᛋᛋ
There is a thing called "zero risk repetition" which saving helps you to avoid.

Let's say, Hitman game. At the start of the level I got to run several streets, go up the ladder, sneak, lockpick a door, take a disguise and then go down. It takes several minutes to do and involves no risk whatsoever. But then you hit an actual risk moment, fuck up and you got to start anew, repeating all zero risk routine.

This is not fun.
 

Nifft Batuff

Prophet
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
3,169
The diablo games are gatcha by design, so I will no surprised if the have no savegame.
 

Peachcurl

Cipher
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
8,793
Location
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Diablo 1 has manual saves, including the ability to savescum, e.g., when using shrines. But that's with a single save slot.
After that (D2, 3), it's only autosaves (which I guess you mean by "no savegame").
 

laclongquan

Arcane
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,870,144
Location
Searching for my kidnapped sister
I've yet to see a good argument to this that isn't just "but I want to cheat without being called a cheater!!!"
Favor saves, unlimited saves: Tactical combat game, with lotsa combatants, lots variables.

Think Hammer Sickle, or Silent Storm games. Each save/continue doesnt follow the ealier exactly. Too many variables. This bullet may hit, may not hit. It miss but it can ricochet into other things. it can ricochet into a flameable/explosion object. That explosion may, or may not, strong enough to destroy a freaking floor and send some combatants on above down to their death (or just injured).

People dont need many saves if the progression is simplied, or easy. Once things get complicated to certain degree, many saves is a safety requirement.
------------
Favor saves, unlimited saves: Modded game.

Generally once you mod game, your game become more complex. To a certain degree you need lots saves to preserve your progress, of when it's a safe one.

Example: Fallout New Vegas. Once you install mods beyond certain threshold, your game become unstable and you need saves. 20 and upward, active saves, uncounted the rar/zip saves of even earlier.
 
Last edited:

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom