Not the worst possible outcome, assuming a different studio would be doing the engine work. (Obv HBS doesn't have experience with first person stuff.) I like the idea of them doing the writing, C&C, and scenario design, and the expectation of full voice acting would put a hard $ limit on HBS' tendency to too much text.
I wonder what the details on this contract are then... probably some sort of hard time-limit on development time? Since Hardsuit was supposed to release Bloodlines 2 in 2018.
If you meant these isometric shadowrun games they were crap. The combat system was horribly lacking. Basically it looked like some people who didn't even have a clue about combat system on grid space programmed combat system.
Really? I didn't play much ''grid space combat" games but I thought Shadowrun's combat was okay, not like I would play an RPG for it's combat. Care to elaborate on how it was bad?
... That's exactly what Smartgun systems are supposed to do.
You're using the prelude training mission, with a starting character, as your example. Eiger, the only companion that uses heavy guns, is not even in the mission. It's not as if Temple of Trials is exemplary of the rest of Fallout 2 either.
40% or more chances that he isn't working anywhere today.
Props to HBS if so. These days 'non-correctable toxic behavior' is often code for "white dude is white duding" and it's rare to have it apply equally to other demographics.
Given Kiva's pouty Battletech post-mortem articles, this looks rather applicable.
Best type of game! It occurs at a rate of 41%!
Here's the post with my selections https://rpgcodex.net/forums/threads...rebrained-schemes.121538/page-91#post-7087868
