Sometimes it's edge posting, but other times the arguments brought up are valid, but go unaddressed. The FO3 thread was an obvious bait thread, but this doesn't seem like one to me. I can understand not wanting to rehash an argument that's already been had, but it looks to me that a lot of people accept these games as "classics" at face value, without ever actually addressing any criticisms.Arcanum is a classic for a reason. Is it perfect? NO. Nothing is. Try playing the black mountain clan part as a tecknological character if you want to rage hard for example. But this edgeposting comes around every few months/years. Why Arcanum is teh suck, 21 reasons. Why Fallout 3 is the best Fallout (yes there was an actual thread). Why Baldur's Gate is terrible.
We get it, you're contrarian. Goddamn edgelords edging for attention and Kodex Kool Kredits.
If this exact topic has already been discussed before, I'd love for you to link me to said thread, as I'd love to read through it since I think this is an interesting topic.