Reactivity exists, huh.
I liked her too. One of the reasons being specifically the fact that you can lose her and are even encouraged to do so. Makes character much more valuable.
Camellia is probably my least favorite companion in the Wrath's cast but I still find her a quite curious social experiment - her whole meta-schtick is how far the boys from Steam and other boards could go while rabidly white-knighting for the nice pair of tits, even when said pair attached to the irredeemably evil murder-psycho. Really, her writer was not even trying to give her semi-decent excuse like "difficult past/childhood", and it is very noticeable when you compare her to more reasonably-evil Wenduag who had got a lot of interesting interactions and at least some personality outside from her blatant evilness.
You can ask Melies about that and he tells you that both him and his troops are disguised with magic. So other people in your council room straight up do not see him as a giant burning devil.
A literal infant is probably the only person Early Sunset might plausibly fool.
Uh what's wrong about him? Never used the guy so can't say much about him, just that he is black and cleric.
I still have no idea what the fuck you are talking about. It could be impossible to go under the stairs because the stairs are actually a transparent cube with "stairs" located inside the cube, and a pathing map painted over the part that is actually the stairs.So for anyone interested - this is what I meant 10 or so pages ago.
As depicted above, the stairs look like they are 3D, while in fact they are not. It is impossible to go underneath.
The same was true in the 90's when the DOOM engine had the same limitations, and only the development of Quake brought true 3D - when a point on the bridge and right under the bridge became both accessible.
So in the mounted combat the rider and the mount are located at (roughly) the same point in 2D space, but their elevations are different. What if the game plays the same trick: it looks like the rider and the mount are separate attackers, while in fact they are not? Or, even worse: what if their attacks have different 2D coordinates instead of having the same? So the rider looks together with the mount, while in fact they attack different points on the flat surface?
I think it might lead to the whole bunch of bugs, which are not bugs, but the difference between the expectations from the picture and the limitations of the engine.
And yet no one is your court of desna hippies mentions how strange any of ES's suggestions are. For people who litterally worship azatas and Elysium gods, that's a bit weird. Granted I followed his advice because I thought a character who was kinda given azata powers randomly would be pretty influenceable especially when faced with the responsibility of a crusade. It actually make the whole path more interesting this way.
Technically, she does, you just don't get to find out about it until the very end of her questline - and most people will have killed her off by then, or accepted any atrocities without knowing about it. So in that sense, it's still a nice social experiment or rather showcases the willingness of people to simp for someone who simply doesn't deserve any kindness towards her. But shes portrayed as a "gorgeous" woman (straight woman, at that) so people simp for her regardless of her lack of redeeming qualities.
I picked urgathoa as a lich, and aside from lots of "a moth appears as a clear sign that you are pleasing urgathoa" there's been any reactivity.
There is some here and there. Like the priests of Urgathoa that join you praise you for it. I think I saw some others do as well. But if you mean if there were any quests to solve of specific content, yea I have not seen that as well.
Should we consider the fact that she is the only straight option for male characters a part of said social experiment?
Paladin chick is not straight?
Barbarian chick in last game was also not romanceable, is this because they are iconic PF characters?!
I mean, Amiri doesn't like men in general, and Seelah spends life fangirling over stronk female knights.
I don't know if the game's writing does this, but I remember certain discussions of the AP online that had this interesting little metaplot about why exactly the Crusaders are such failures and it's all due to Baphomet. Iomedae's Church and their way of thinking was a good match for Deskari. The demon lord is aggressive and brutal, but a straightfoward opponent. And the knights that serve Iomedae do just that, fight straightforward battles. The Crusades were successful as long as both sides were the same.
