Because if you elaborate in the history of slavery, you will be forced to recognize that eastern europeans are those who suffered the most with the institution of slavery, that the arab slave trade was far worse and enslaved Europeans too, that less than 1% of southern whites on USA owned slaves, that Brazil took dozens of times more slaves than USA and was a blonde, blue eyed princess(Isabel) who ended slavery in Brazil and the empire suffered a coup as a consequence of it. In fact, abolitionists was mostly whites. Slavery is not the "white evil, black victim" as the public indoctrination completely dominated by marxist of Frankfurt school makes you believe. Is a much more complex topic.
About the Arab slave trade. Do you know why there are way less descendants of slaves in Arab countries than in Brazil for eg? Castration.
And Marxism only bough mystery and tyranny; All of Marx predictions was wrong. The unique good thing about marxism is that it eventually collapses.
No, I would't like her regardless of her skin color. She is too moralist and egalitarian.
lol, what? etymologcially the term slave derives from the eastern european tribe of Slavs, but the origin of slavery in history dates back to neolithical era, and was industrialized in China and Egypt, Europeans were rather late to that party.
but the volumes of slaves (trivial) is never the issue of any serious debate on slavery, but their origin, reasons and consequences. although quoted argumentation is the stereotypical example it still indicates the real issue: the 1% southerners, that owned slaves.
read again: Nebenwertkrise. is a systemic installed distraction from the real issue of
classism, aka the (social) environment for
capitalism.
Marx as scientist, not ideologist, is undisputed at least in academic milieu. Marx sociological analysis of society cant be denied, as the collective hierarchy is a class based caste system. Marx became the fundament for every sociologial discipline (like Antropology), from Durkheim to Bourdieu.
just to avoid a fundamental misunderstanding - the ideology (is not the sociology) of marxist((-leninist, whatever) communism is nonsense for many reasons, although it is in fact the basic understanding of human rights - every human being has to have the same rights.
but the real issue isnt even the fact that Brazil is another stereotypical example (as Portugese colony) for white capital not only exploiting natives and forced immigrants, (like the US was build on forced immigration,) but themselves and their own people. the real issue is systemic exploitation, aka capitalism, which eventually will (to quote ur words) "collapse" not the world, but mankind, cuz climate change due to capitalistic exploitation is real.
racism, as sexism, as poverty is just one of the many (Nebenwertkrisen) factors capitalism abuses for distraction.
but the debate is about the writing of Seelah character. a few defensive reactions, while others outright stated their racism and interestingly some rlly seemed to like Seelah. so my hypothesis on Seelah being a controversial character and on Owlcats intent (she is the singular Black character in PF for a statement to the audience) is quod erat demonstrandum.
there still is one major criteria missing: the definition of quality (aka good) writing. but i dont expect even a naive linguistic approach from kkKodex: prove me wrong.