It doesn't mean they don't do similar and better though.
Really? So how does a typical walking sim autist play TW3? Nothing like Skyrim, because he can't "go anywhere, be anyone". He can go where the story lets him and be Geralt.
It's like me saying "I don't think anyone nails the CDPR formula like they do. Open world, 3rd person, fantasy setting, play a set character, rape novels etc" selectively picking a few elements to eliminate other games which are very much like Skyrim in all but a few ways is just strange.
It wouldn't be if you were trying to emulate TW3's success. Though nothing I said comes close to "rape novels" as a qualifier. All of it is general and perfectly doable for any dev studio. I think you're just being a bit butthurt that nothing on your list qualifies or even comes close.
And nah, I genuinely don't. Skyrim was a fad, 70% of the Earths population are fuckwits who follow fads.
Well, it's a good thing your career doesn't depend on understanding the audience you just wrote off as
fuckwit automatons. They may well be fuckwits, but they also want to play the game for a reason, and that reason isn't "I r dum, giv dum gaem plz."
If you're not prepared to admit that, then why bother writing such a long post? You could say the same thing with simply, "Bethesda fans aren't human."
I'm sure that'd mine you some good ratings, but it's not really a great argument.