It was mostly disagreeing with the idea that Far Cry 2 is another collect-a-thon, as it was mostly devoid of the systems common to them
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
rpgcodex > the threads can be improved by adding more replies
baud
good fucking shit happen
They hadn't really gotten their formula down at that point, but if you have played one Farcry with the exception of the first one then you have played them all.
good fucking shit happen
It's not a terrible game or anything, it's just that after FC2 every other game in the series has been the same but with minor differences. Stealthing into a camp in FC2 is the same as when you do it in FC5.
good fucking shit happen
The collection bogus has gotten worse with time, as has the leveling systems and all that crap. Ubisoft's big series have also started to morph into one another, where everything feels samey.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.