Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Just curious,he seem too narrow minded. I watch when the video is on interesting topic,but he always talks about the same shit. Muh IQ and muh intelligence. He does give an interesting perspective,but generally he just repeat himself ad nauseum.
What happened with the other guy? He was pretty interesting watch. Does he have a channel or something ? Hes autism was impressive and he gave a pretty unique perspective on the discussions.
I believe that Woodley simply wasn't much interested in livestreaming. He even has a habit of pacing around when he thinks, which is bloody inconvenient if you're supposed to be talking into a static microphone.
He was also the more research-oriented of the two, while Dutton is more about political implications, publishing books for a 'general' audience, and so on - his degree was in theology, while Woodley has some more technical and scientific degree.
Hmmm i think that there was a bit of envy from Dutton side,could have been an ego thing. Woody seemed like he enjoyed their talks. It would have been better if they had quests.
True, Dutton was rude to Woodley sometimes. Hard to tell if that was pure rudeness, or just mild autism and trying to keep the stream engaging as opposed to getting too academic.
Bing what do you think about dutton? Do you agree with me that he is very narrow minded and ends up explaining everything with muh IQ and muh intelligence?
Yes, the narrow focus on it is quite annoying sometimes. But that doesn't mean I actually disagree with him, at most I'd say he tilts things by omission.
Ahh i don't agree with him per se,but he is just assuming that a small part of the equation is the whole answer. His focus is too narrow,he looks at it as individuals and systems,while a whole human group is a single being.
Not really,he looks at it as a group not as a whole organism. It is like a human per se. Leukocytes are good thing to have,but when you have too much they end up fucking up other cells and you kick the bucket. Same is with human society,group,tribe,nation etc etc. Intelligence is a not a good thing to have,it is a simple trigger in a larger system.
Intelligent people are there to create stress and inject new mutations in the form of ideas. That is why most intelligent people are unattractive,asocial and generally genetic dead ends.
When you increase the population's intelligent level to much you end up with too much people that do nothing but whine and you end up with mutations getting accepted without any real opposition,and some mutations are harmful as you well know.
That is when the bigger organism of humanity as a whole kicks in. When a culture becomes too smart the leukocytes kick in and begin fucking it up ....aka lol iq primal people that don't care about that shit and like to kill rape and burn .
Hahahaha no,selective breeding and good education mean high IQ,not high intelligence. Those people are of middle intelligence and are mostly the ruling class,which comes from a warrior cast. That is why when they end up becoming of too intelligent you see a revolution and systematic change. Nobility does changes trough brutality that comes from the lower class.
I agree with the general anti-intelligent view, since after all right now ''intelligent'' people are choosing to have fewer children and die out.... but what's the distinction between IQ and intelligence?
Well intelligence is that natural ability of a human to think quick and accumulating knowledge,also the upper limit for accumulating knowledge
IQ is a modern way of people to brag about being "intelligent". In reality is a number that shows the amount of knowledge you have,which is generally western orientated.
Also good looks are irrelevant when it comes to breeding. looking good does give you better chance of getting laid,but fucking doesn't equals breeding. Most important part in wooing is sociability and power/strength. There is plenty of ugly men that fuck good women. After all breeding is all about security.
Men look for women that could produce future for their blood line,while women look for a man that could deliver safety for them and their brood. Before it was about raw strength,now it is more about making money...for now . Intelligence is like wonder lust,thing that stimulates the organism but it is dangerous if too much,that is in our dna to not reproduce if too smart.
I do agree that Dutton is a bit too narrowminded but I take that to his ignorance on certain levels. I dislike the most his fetish for the theory of evolution.
Intelligence is related to good genes and therefore to other chad characteristics. But yes there is a cutoff point. At around 130 IQ I'd say. Then you have the 2 standard deviation communication gap.
And of course if everyone else around is an idiocracy NPC character then it's shit.
You are correct that genius(! big difference, not just high IQ) is an extreme outlier.
And geniuses don't care, they are rude. Funnily enough, just like you.
You are correct that too high IQ is not fit for humanity. IQ is higly inversely correlated with low birth rate and also correlated with openness (which is bad in certain ways, of course). So it's self-containing and so ultimately there is very likely an IQ ceiling for humanity.
Ahh who knows mate,maybe i am genius,but that will remain a mystery . And lol assuming that muh being smart is good and dumb is bad,is just stupid. Humans exist and progress in a community,which needs both types of in certain amount to be successful.
High IQ is related to being higher functioning in general and also empathy. But this is only useful in homogenous societies, of course. And if you let in the savages then it's all ogre, of course.
Kinda like what happened to Europe and all the jewish destructive memes.
Ahh IQ is a modern bullshit evaluation system. Such system as you say don't exist,humanity is made in such a way that there will always be a lower class that will end up angry and rise up.
Dear me, did you really watch Dutton's vids? IQ may be affected by knowledge accumulated, but it is still largely a valid measure of intelligence. Good looks indicate genetic quality, or at least you have to not be ugly and look appropriately feminine/masculine.
And the high IQ would end up with more surviving children in the past, their current low birthrate is because of unprecedented socioeconomic and cultural conditions - do we really want a humanity that evolves for this current social setup??
Ahhh i am confused here. Why do you assume watching equals agreeing,i said that he pretty narrow minded and overcompensating with the muh IQ thing. I think that IQ is a retarded point system that mediocre people use to delude themself that they are better than others. It is class system for the middle class.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Comments on Profile Post by fantadomat
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.