Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

rpgcodex > the threads can be improved by adding more replies

V_K
V_K
Charisma-based bards are shitty bards though. You need brains to write a good song; if you need to rely on charisma to sell it, means your song is shit.
Humbaba
Humbaba
Tbf to be a good musician you need god given talent, and talent like that is represented by CHA, not INT
V_K
V_K
If we're being real, within the 6 DnD stats, conventionally understood talent falls very clearly under Wisdom domain. Charisma has nothing to do with it - most great artists were asocial as fuck. DnD designers were just desperate to make Cha less of a dump stat.
Humbaba
Humbaba
Then why are sorcerers, whose magic is based on inherent aptitude CHA based casters?
V_K
V_K
For the very same reason, duh. Just look at stat descirptions in 2e, before all this Cha-based casters nonsense:
"The Charisma (Cha) score measures a character's persuasiveness, personal magnetism, and ability to lead. It is not a reflection of physical attractiveness, although attractiveness certainly plays a role."
See anything about talent or inherent aptitude?

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom