Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review CGM bones Lionheart

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,670
Location
Behind you.
Tags: Lionheart: Legacy of the Crusader

<b>Sharpei Diem</b> sends word that <a href="http://www.cgonline.com/cgm/200311-m1.html">Computer Games Magazine</A> printed their review of <A href="http://lionheart.blackisle.com">Lionheart</a> this month. They gave it a <b>2/5</b>, and had these flattering words to say:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>..However, when you combine the tart freshness of Diablo with the rich, meaty flavor of Fallout, you get Lionheart, which is quite possibly the most unpalatable role-playing game concocted in recent memory. Inexpertly tossed together, and summarily half-baked by Reflexive Entertainment, it's a gooey mess of reflex-driven combat, muddled interface, cliched dungeon designs, and useless player decisions. One could include its length - under 20 hours - as a fault, but it's almost a relief to see this mess pass through so quickly.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Damn, that even made me wince. Brutal, baby. Just brutal!
<br>
<br>
Thanks for the mail, <b>Sharpei Diem</b>!
<br>
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom