a bear named spigot
Arcane
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2012
- Messages
- 784
Keep fighting the good fight, Vince. Your inexhaustible politeness and patience on the Steam forum is inspiring.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Game News Age of Decadence Released on Steam Early Access
- Thread starter Infinitron
- Start date
Lhynn
Arcane
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2013
- Messages
- 9,957
Why didnt i think of that?
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 99,614
Links to thread!
Vault Dweller
Commissar, Red Star Studio
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2003
- Messages
- 28,044
Whisky
The Solution
Holy shit. This man truly has the blood of El Cid flowing in his veins.
Invite him here!
Invite him here!
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2012
- Messages
- 5,320
That Gubmint fellow seems absolutely devastated. Someone should cheer him up.
hiver
Guest
Im just about to kill everyone at the outpost.
ill put up a video so you can post it there to make them cry even more. Use my Militades fight videos too.
Poor assholes.
Im not really sure what is the point of explaining things to those morons .. but i guess its nice PR thing to see a dev trying, even for such scum.
I would say cut them loose and worry about players who like it and those in between.
ill put up a video so you can post it there to make them cry even more. Use my Militades fight videos too.
Poor assholes.
Im not really sure what is the point of explaining things to those morons .. but i guess its nice PR thing to see a dev trying, even for such scum.
I would say cut them loose and worry about players who like it and those in between.
Burst out laughing.EDIT:
Ohh he got you there, the game said "Fuck off" to him!
Last edited:
UnknownBro
Savant
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2012
- Messages
- 373
AstroZombie
Arcane
Fryjar
Augur
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2005
- Messages
- 176
While there are certainly a lot of overly emotional statements in there, it also pretty much confirms what others and me have mentioned in this thread before:
A lot of people don't get some of the core design concepts of the game that differ from what they are used to in other rpgs. Would it really hurt, to communicate these design decisions to them?
Consider that only the most vocal people actually care enough to make a forum post. Many others will simply fail, think that something is wrong with the game, and never touch it again. If you are expecting them to stick with the game long enough to figure out your design philosophies that's fair enough, but many simply won't bother, even if they are mentally capable of recognizing the patterns if they were to play a bit longer.
Again, in the linked thread nearly all the people that complained there mentioned that they have spread their points too thinly. I talked in my previous post about this before in more detail, but would it really hurt you that much, to provide a recommended build for each class + a popup that mentions during char generation that a jack of all trades is NOT viable and one has to focus at the beginning on a few core skills to be successful?
The same holds true for fights, that many people are not expected to win. This is a completely foreign concept to rpg players, even experienced ones, so why not simply tell them this before the first tough fight? This way, they realize that it is by design that they struggle/ are not expected to win the fight and not because the game system is inherently flawed.
Why does it make sense to communicate this to the players? Think about Dark Souls and their design philosophy that dying/ struggling is part of the gameplay. I can imagine that the rage would have been tremendous if people were to blindly buy the game without having read anything about it. Now Dark Souls had the tremendous advantage, that every single review out there mentioned this design philosophy, and players therefore knew what they were getting into. And they either appreciated it or simply saw that the design approach was not for them. But at the very least players didn't consider the game system as inherently flawed for misunderstanding what the designers intended.
AoD doesn't have that advantage, so you either can do something yourself to educate the players or put up with lots of unwarranted criticism from players (and a large silent minority that simply drops the game), that fault the game for the wrong reasons.
Last edited:
I dunno...
The apparent butthurt over the game's difficulty could be enough to generate a buzz resulting in more sales not less.
The apparent butthurt over the game's difficulty could be enough to generate a buzz resulting in more sales not less.
Monkeyfinger
Cipher
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2004
- Messages
- 779
Demon's souls wasn't marketed by From Software as a hardcore die-all-the-time experience. It got that reputation from word of mouth starting on large gaming forums, the same way AoD is doing now. Corny ass lines like "Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition" didn't show up until a couple years after everyone knew what the Souls series was all about.
The solution to people not "getting" AoD is to throw the dedicated, hardcore fans just enough bones that they can learn the game inside and out, then let forums and youtube do the rest of the work. This is a slow process that won't result in tremendous day 1 sales + reviews, but it gives a game long legs. Open betas and early access are quite a nice head start to have.
Trying to beat the popamole masses over the head with in game hints is a futile exercise for a game like this, because there's too much you'd need to teach.
The solution to people not "getting" AoD is to throw the dedicated, hardcore fans just enough bones that they can learn the game inside and out, then let forums and youtube do the rest of the work. This is a slow process that won't result in tremendous day 1 sales + reviews, but it gives a game long legs. Open betas and early access are quite a nice head start to have.
Trying to beat the popamole masses over the head with in game hints is a futile exercise for a game like this, because there's too much you'd need to teach.
Last edited:
Whisky
The Solution
Clearly what needs to be done is produce a Youtube video of various player characters in AoD dying horribly in different situations while "THIS IS THE NEW SHIT" plays over it.
Add some cheap video filters and effects for maximum kool.
Add some cheap video filters and effects for maximum kool.
- Joined
- May 8, 2007
- Messages
- 470
Don't we already have the Incline video that does basically this?
Johannes
Arcane
The real problem to me is the fact that jack of all trades are not viable enough (unless you know exactly what you are doing through metagaming). For most people (including me) a jack of all trades of some extent will be much more interesting character concept than an all-out fighter, or all-out talker or thief. And there's nothing particularly realistic or intuitive about a singleminded character design being superior, overall. So the problem is the combination of there not being enough skill points to make a well rounded character, and also that when you do make a well rounded character, you won't know how soon or how often a skill will actually be used.
It's not so much that effective starting builds cannot be made, but they tend to be either boring or based on metagaming.
So I think an ideal solution would be to add more skillpoints on chargen, but also more options to gain from different skills very early, for all backgrounds. Or get more maluses than you get now, for not having some non-essential skill. There's no way for a new player to know how early on a specific skill will present an opportunity for use, ie. if it's a worthwhile or useless investment upon starting out for a given background. By adding more early skill checks you're bridging this gap. Later on it isn't as crucial how often any skill will be used, since it's been of at least some use already.
And if you did simply give some more points upon startup, what would that change? First time players would still mostly die before getting the hang of it, but for a shorter length of time. And experienced players could stretch their points a bit thinner across various skills early on, late game those initial skillpoints wouldn't be a big difference either way. As far as getting to do everything with a single character? Not gonna happen even if you'd have 10's in everything.
It's not so much that effective starting builds cannot be made, but they tend to be either boring or based on metagaming.
So I think an ideal solution would be to add more skillpoints on chargen, but also more options to gain from different skills very early, for all backgrounds. Or get more maluses than you get now, for not having some non-essential skill. There's no way for a new player to know how early on a specific skill will present an opportunity for use, ie. if it's a worthwhile or useless investment upon starting out for a given background. By adding more early skill checks you're bridging this gap. Later on it isn't as crucial how often any skill will be used, since it's been of at least some use already.
And if you did simply give some more points upon startup, what would that change? First time players would still mostly die before getting the hang of it, but for a shorter length of time. And experienced players could stretch their points a bit thinner across various skills early on, late game those initial skillpoints wouldn't be a big difference either way. As far as getting to do everything with a single character? Not gonna happen even if you'd have 10's in everything.
[Lore]: By playing the game tons of times such knowledge is acquired.
Whisky
The Solution
Has a jack of all trades really been good in any game? I mean, aside from ones where you get enough points to invest in every skill to a powerful level (Fallout, for example, gives you more than enough points to be a master of diplomacy and combat.).
Usually it seems like you're always better off specializing.
Though I do agree with your points.
Usually it seems like you're always better off specializing.
Though I do agree with your points.
Jim the Dinosaur
Arcane
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,144
Maybe he shouldn't just explain that you shouldn't expect to be able to win every fight, which he already does quite consistently, but also what the consequences are. As far as I can tell a relatively big amount of the events that net you xp or whatever are one-offs that you can't go back to at a later point. You'd expect people to think that this'd lead them into a spiral once they've passed on fights because they were too hard, didn't get the extra skill points, then got left with even harder fights that they're even less prepared to deal with, and so on.
DONT SAY NOTHING FROM ME
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.