What's a joke?
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Best combat between solasta/os2/pf games
- Thread starter KainenMorden
- Start date
Blutwurstritter
Learned
D:OS2 > Solasta > Pathfinder. I don't care much for third edition combat. Its mostly about stacking AC/AB and then auto-attack to victory plus some disabling spells here and there. But the basic gamplay doesn't change much as you progress, the AC/AB boni just have different names as you level up. There aren't enough encounters that force you to change your approach. Solasta has similar problems but its not as bloated and the game ends before it gets too tiresome and repetitive. D:OS2 keeps things interesting using the environment and positioning, even if the elemental effects are overdone at times. It was also nice to have a game with a set of spells different to the familiar stuff from D&D. The encounters and usage of the bestiary were also better. I was not tired of the combat in D:OS2, but I had to pass a successful will save to continue at the later stages of Solasta and Pathfinder.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.