curry
Arcane
Well we all know that the masses buy their console games based on how visually appealing they are so it would also make sense from the business perspective to use the new engin.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Game News Bethesda: Making Games for the PC Gamers
- Thread starter VentilatorOfDoom
- Start date
hoopy
Savant
What's also funny is that Bethesda wasn't able to make a different interface for the PC version, yet some fan(s?) made one in about a month, without official development tools let alone access to the source code. How long would it have taken Bethesda if they had put a couple of competent guys on it? A week? A few days? But they didn't do it.
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 14,785
Well, no. Skyrim showed that the masses will buy it anyway - even with a terribly dated engine - as long as you hype it through the roof as the second coming. Why change the engine then? Wasted cash.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.