Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview BioShock Q&A at GameSpy

TheGreatGodPan

Arbiter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
1,762
In case you guys want to see a giant idiot who despises all that you stand for get into a moronic internet argument with me concerning Bioshock and dumbing down/mainstreaming click here.

Some of the people in that thread, like Papy, seem just right for the codex. I think Espark would be seen as going way too far even by the most raving ESFers.
 

Zomg

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 21, 2005
Messages
6,984
I dunno. I think anyone that says that the stupidly unbalanced and enigmatic skills in SS2 were a good thing has shitty taste.
 

vazquez595654

Erudite
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
1,093
Location
Malta
Aren't we all forgetting the main issue here?

If the game is good, it will not sell because it will be too hard and complex for the masses, and Irrational games will shut down.

If the game sucks, it will sell, but none of us will want to play it, or trust Irrational games again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom