One of the major systems and features of ToEE is party creation. It is a major focus of the game and gives the game great reply value for people who enjoy robust party creation, building, and options. This is not true at all with KotC where there are what? 3 races and 3 classes? Far less options that trickle down to a no class-change or multiclass mechanic and the lack of major D20 core feats. The lack of options in party creation also mean a lack of options in combat. There is no thievery subsystem. No skills. Large dearths of gameplay that is prominent or a huge focus of ToEE and not in KotC.
All games have a finite amount of options in character or party creation or building. ToEE has far more options than KotC. KotC has about the same amount of options as Spiderweb games. Spiderweb games, and KotC, play far more similarly to each other than they do ToEE.
I think this is clear and self evident to people who prefer rpgs over other genres.
There is no forum out there that focuses solely on a very specific theme while also having more than 10 people posting there. Yea 'Dex has different stuff (Strategy section for me is often more interesting than RPG one), but if you check out the news section 90% of it are RPG games, the 10% are rpg like.
Click to expand...
Mmorpg.com used to focus and report on only mmorpgs. You would expect to find people on the site that played and enjoyed mmorpgs. Now that they are a general gaming site this is no longer true. Their community is compromised of people who play video games, like major video game sites. Their name, by admission, is not correct any longer, but was correct at one point.
Looking through the front page there seems to be a multi-genre focus, with almost exclusive rpg news related to kickstarter or vine campaigns. Judging from every article currently on the news page, this site is absolutely the worst rpg site I have ever seen for getting rpg news from the news section.
Judging from forum popularity and discussion, Asian video games, not Asian rpgs, are of the greatest interest of this site's members other than site discussion and "run of the mill conversation." I do not know why this site considers it to be an rpg site nor how it has been given a reputation for a hard core rpg site. This may have been true at one time but surely is not now. I see no reason for the staff not to be open and honest about it like the staff of mmorpg.com. Unless you somehow believe in Orwellian mindcrime and double speak and want this site to be something it clearly isn't.
Of course his religion is important. This place is all about religion. We got Bethestards, Obsitards, IEtards, Jews, Nazi, Turks, Potatos, Gays, GayforAvellone and the rest. Even some people pretending they are straight and white.
And you got it right about being less rules. This forum is mostly unmoderated and as a result nobody is blocking your right to say what you want and how you want it. You can have any kind of discussion you want in any way you want as long it is within the theme of the subforum. No other place has this while also being a forum and being visited by many devs who sometimes talk to us mortals.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry but I do not follow. Jews are perfectly capable of answering simple questions. Being a Jew stops no person from thinking or answering questions.
I didn't put him down (or do not believe I did). I praised him for his ability to answer questions.
Are you saying it sucks as a rpg site because it focuses on rpgs? Or it is not as good as this site because this site is more fun to post on regardless of it being a general gaming site? Objectively you would have to agree a site focusing on rpgs is a far better rpg site. Subjectively which site is better to be a member of for general discussion or freedoms of speech your opinion, like everyone's, is as right as it is wrong.
Click to expand...