i am all earsI'd suggest to chance the rules for bans/picks,
Lizzurd and Grimwulf must play pretender nations and name their pretenders Lizzurd and Grimwulf respectively. Additional titles allowed.
Let both teams pick one or two nations for their opponents.
That is the dumbest thing i have ever heard. If you insist on this - then i will pick Ermor for your team. Try to find someone who will agree to play it!
This can very easily ruin any strategy.
Do you want to expand to 5v5? We seem to have Dreaad and Malakal as volunteers. (Or was Malakal just volunteering to play disciple Ermor?)
NOOOO! THIS WAS MY FAVOURITE NATION! YOU WILL TAKE REVENGE!Also, we ban NAZCA
NOOOO! THIS WAS MY FAVOURITE NATION! YOU WILL TAKE REVENGE!Also, we ban NAZCA
YOU WILL TAKE REVENGE!
YOU WILL TAKE REVENGE!
what
I'd have to admit that this thread is hilarious, at least.
And I'm very, very curious if the Disciple Ermor strategy is viable. We had a similar discussion in another thread and Grimwulf has made some interesting points. I think it's quite suicidal, but it would be fun to see it in action.
My points about bans/picks is that, despite the system not being bad, the end result is that some nations get always killed off quite soon. You'll never leave Agartha in MA, or Ulm/Atlantis in LA. So methinks we should conjure something new for Decline9. Less, or even no bans, to give all the choices to the masses.