Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Fallout 4 Pre-Release Discussion [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

uaciaut

Augur
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
505
No matter what arguments you can bring for/against Fallout 3 you can't say it's a replayable game, how the fuck is the F4 trailer boosting sales for F3 so much i don''t fucking get it how are people this dumb.
 

Akratus

Self-loathing fascist drunken misogynist asshole
Patron
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
0
Location
The Netherlands
Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Woah, his post was so hard to decipher! What did he say, something about Fallout? Ouch my brain! This must be what a Fallout 4 pre-ordering fan feels like!
 

Modron

Arcane
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
11,154
No matter what arguments you can bring for/against Fallout 3 you can't say it's a replayable game, how the fuck is the F4 trailer boosting sales for F3 so much i don''t fucking get it how are people this dumb.

Generally people purchasing a game are playing said game for first time not replaying it (old games being re-released excluded of course).
 

Cthulhu_is_love

Guest
At first I thought we make fun about Fallout and Bethesda, but I think most people on this thread are really fanboys.

:rpgcodex:Makabb...
 

Makabb

Arcane
Shitposter Bethestard
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Messages
11,753
At first I thought we make fun about Fallout and Bethesda, but I think most people on this thread are really fanboys.

:rpgcodex:Makabb...


I'm a fanboy of fallout 1 and 2 and not of bethesda. Fallout 4 is the closest that we get to fallout today.


It has SPECIAL
it has power armor
it has leveling up
it has perks

It's Fallout ! :M
 

Shin

Cipher
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
697
Reminds me of this classic
It's a radioactive wasteland, man. You can never be sure!

Fxtz6k.gif

I've seen that movie a hundred times and yet this is the first time I've noticed the severed head looks like a contemporary David Hasselhoff.

 

Catfish

Learned
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
222
Your argument for why single-character turn-based can work is...pointing towards a turn-based game where you control a party?
No. The issue was positioning in a turn-based game. My answer is pointing to mechanics that make positioning relevant
Nothing you said addresses any of the issues of single-character turn-based games. I would argue that positioning is less of an element when all the enemies on the battle field have the exact same target.

This can be solved by adding new game mechanics to an already decent system. Case in point - "Boolean" behavior for the player. Instead of positioning and firing/overwatching you position the character and then set behaviors for different scenarios during the enemy turn (bad guy I see stays at current position - fire single shot. Bad guy tries to rush - fire burst). This actually goes really well with special, in that a certain stat or combination of stats could govern, say, the number of scenarios you are allowed to punch in. This seems to me like the natural evolution of a single character turn based combat system, and yet was never even attempted
 

Catfish

Learned
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
222
A buddy of mine gifted me all the rest of the New Vegas DLC for free and I still never got around to playing it.

Damn, I wanted to start with "you should try", but then I remembered how much enjoyment of the other ones relies on personal taste. Okay, here is a breakdown (because I still think they are all worth checking out):

1) Honest Hearts feels like stepping into a Fenimore Cooper novel - at times beautiful and inspiring, at times bland as fuck in how straightforward the tribal purity card is played. A lot of codexers call fo3 a hiking simulator - well this one is just that, but in a good way.

2) Old World Blues is by far my favorite piece of post-bethesder fallout writing, because it doesn't take itself seriously at all. If you read the fallout bible - this is basically the EPA cut from FO2, but with a crazy hat. This is also the most extreme "future as seen from the fifties" - futurama levels. If you like (and know) 50s sci-fi b-movies you shan't miss it

3) Lonesome road is a bit like the Hags Maze from PS:T. It forces you to explore the heavy philosophical relationship between people and symbols, and gets really meta in the "what drives exploration in game worlds" department. Plus this is a piece of the world where a bleak rubble pile of a location is entirely justified, unlike FO3.

So I'd say any of these is worth your time if you are into any of the above.
 

imweasel

Guest
Gameplay-wise HL2 was a pinnacle of innovation, no arguing here, but visually... sorry, it was barely OK for 2004. Particularly, lighting was total crap so everything looked flat including character models. Now FO3 didn't look like a proper 2008 game (e.g. Crysis Warhead) but it was a solid lightyear ahead of HL2 in terms of gfx tech.
/facepalm
I take it no-one here remembers what FPS gameplay was like before HL2. Well, carry on.
Newfags. Newfags never change.

Make an entire board for fo4 so I can just ignore all this shit.
I know. I keep saying we have the perfect forum for discussing Fallout 4, retardo land.
We should have a vote about moving this thread to retardo land. And then ban anybody who votes "no". ^^
 

Zombra

An iron rock in the river of blood and evil
Patron
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
11,843
Location
Black Goat Woods !@#*%&^
Make the Codex Great Again! RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is. Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
No matter what arguments you can bring for/against Fallout 3 you can't say it's a replayable game
Eh, gonna have to call you on that. Multiple quest resolutions, open world structure, different character builds. I played through three times from beginning to end and had a completely different experience each time.

Make an entire board for fo4 so I can just ignore all this shit.
Learn to forum.
Ignore Thread button
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom