Pink Eye
Monk
Dude, some advice, go rub one out. Then come back with a clear head. You'll quickly realize internet "women" are not worth troubling about.
Bigot communities have the most amount of diversity.It's one of the many truly inclusive spaces, which is why gamers are against wokeness.I find it fascinating that the codex userbase ranges from happily married normies to comedically maladjusted incels. The duality of gamers.
Dude, some advice, go rub one out. Then come back with a clear head. You'll quickly realize internet "women" are not worth troubling about.
we did have at least one real tranny who got the boot for that reason.
Who?
We had a tranny whose entire post history was "teehee I'm a tranny porn star, look at my huge dick" and he never got banned.
We had a tranny whose entire post history was "teehee I'm a tranny porn star, look at my huge dick" and he never got banned.
SMA was "one of us" before his fall. You get leniency for that. Plus watching Major_Blackhart lust after him as novel back then.
The trannies that came after him were not so lucky.
I can't remember names, I pay even less attention to trannies than I do to women.
I envy the ability to write truth with so few words. I am way to long-winded in my way of speaking and writing.Dude, some advice, go rub one out. Then come back with a clear head. You'll quickly realize internet "women" are not worth troubling about.
You can't rub out loneliness.
I envy the ability to write truth with so few words. I am way to long-winded in my way of speaking and writing.
Well there was no criminal conviction upheld for Cosby, so regarding that part I agree.I envy the ability to write truth with so few words. I am way to long-winded in my way of speaking and writing.
It's very easy! Observe these true, yet succinct statements:
- Epstein didn't kill himself.
- Bill Cosby did nothing wrong.
- Israel did 9/11.
- Anime is the pinnacle of human expression.
Yeah, but whatever the rule is we have about stalkerish behaviour.SB archive
So what level of attention is allowed then?
The real issue here is that in sexual dynamics men are the ones who have to engage in behavior that will lead to attention from the female, as cringe as SumDrunkGuy behaves, you will not change sexual dynamics by banning the men from the shoutbox.
It is not reasonable in the least to have men bear the responsibility for this alone, there is a kernel of truth from the "women are bad" crowd in that there is no reason for a Person in this forum to tell anyone their sex, there is a reason why avatars and Nicknames exist and saying ones sex does not help in debate, not in GD nor regarding RPGs.
The only purpose for a female to say that they are female is to get attention for that. That the reaction looks like this, in a forum full of unsuccessful men is not only to be expected it is most likely the goal of the women in question. The few times I had the "pleasure" of engaging with theodora in the shoutbox (in which i rarely take part in) always circled around how she gets unwarranted attention from some users while actually engaging in promoting herself sexually to others, i think fluent and atlet were the last discussion.
I do not think it is unwarranted to curb behavior like above with SDG what I do think however is that you DarkUnderlord are better than buying the victim blaming card, women are responsible for their actions and that is including baiting men into this behavior and should face equal repercussions.
At some point you guys really have to ask yourself if this returning "problem" is truly as one-sided as it seems or if this is a gynocentric issue where the men, with their moderation powers, try to protect a woman, who should be capable to do this herself, especially with ignore functions in place.
Yes, I am as uptight regarding this as it seems.
You are the boss here and I do not think it is a good idea to just let this roll one-sided. But I made my position clear, that is all I can do.Yeah, but whatever the rule is we have about stalkerish behaviour.SB archive
So what level of attention is allowed then?
The real issue here is that in sexual dynamics men are the ones who have to engage in behavior that will lead to attention from the female, as cringe as SumDrunkGuy behaves, you will not change sexual dynamics by banning the men from the shoutbox.
It is not reasonable in the least to have men bear the responsibility for this alone, there is a kernel of truth from the "women are bad" crowd in that there is no reason for a Person in this forum to tell anyone their sex, there is a reason why avatars and Nicknames exist and saying ones sex does not help in debate, not in GD nor regarding RPGs.
The only purpose for a female to say that they are female is to get attention for that. That the reaction looks like this, in a forum full of unsuccessful men is not only to be expected it is most likely the goal of the women in question. The few times I had the "pleasure" of engaging with theodora in the shoutbox (in which i rarely take part in) always circled around how she gets unwarranted attention from some users while actually engaging in promoting herself sexually to others, i think fluent and atlet were the last discussion.
I do not think it is unwarranted to curb behavior like above with SDG what I do think however is that you DarkUnderlord are better than buying the victim blaming card, women are responsible for their actions and that is including baiting men into this behavior and should face equal repercussions.
At some point you guys really have to ask yourself if this returning "problem" is truly as one-sided as it seems or if this is a gynocentric issue where the men, with their moderation powers, try to protect a woman, who should be capable to do this herself, especially with ignore functions in place.
Yes, I am as uptight regarding this as it seems.
I absolutely hate this egalitarian view.You are the boss here and I do not think it is a good idea to just let this roll one-sided. But I made my position clear, that is all I can do.Yeah, but whatever the rule is we have about stalkerish behaviour.SB archive
So what level of attention is allowed then?
The real issue here is that in sexual dynamics men are the ones who have to engage in behavior that will lead to attention from the female, as cringe as SumDrunkGuy behaves, you will not change sexual dynamics by banning the men from the shoutbox.
It is not reasonable in the least to have men bear the responsibility for this alone, there is a kernel of truth from the "women are bad" crowd in that there is no reason for a Person in this forum to tell anyone their sex, there is a reason why avatars and Nicknames exist and saying ones sex does not help in debate, not in GD nor regarding RPGs.
The only purpose for a female to say that they are female is to get attention for that. That the reaction looks like this, in a forum full of unsuccessful men is not only to be expected it is most likely the goal of the women in question. The few times I had the "pleasure" of engaging with theodora in the shoutbox (in which i rarely take part in) always circled around how she gets unwarranted attention from some users while actually engaging in promoting herself sexually to others, i think fluent and atlet were the last discussion.
I do not think it is unwarranted to curb behavior like above with SDG what I do think however is that you DarkUnderlord are better than buying the victim blaming card, women are responsible for their actions and that is including baiting men into this behavior and should face equal repercussions.
At some point you guys really have to ask yourself if this returning "problem" is truly as one-sided as it seems or if this is a gynocentric issue where the men, with their moderation powers, try to protect a woman, who should be capable to do this herself, especially with ignore functions in place.
Yes, I am as uptight regarding this as it seems.
absolutely triggered at the idea i would ever "send SDG signals", he joins at least one other codexer on my list of people for whom i'd rather seppuku than so much as have to touch. and the fact that riva can go on for paragraphs about the inherent unfairness of womenfolk, but can't wrap his head around "no means no" is beyond me."women are responsible for their actions and that is including baiting men into this behavior and should face equal repercussions" my ass. Men and women aren't equal in this and shouldn't be treated as such. SDG was rejected like millions of guys before him and he is taking it extraordinarily badly, though he like the rest of us knew the deal before he took it. Nothing left to do for him but to move on tbh. Nothing more pathetic in this world than being jealous of female privilege.
It's not egalitarian in the least, that women and men are not equal is not what I said or meant. But you can ask Theodora what she thinks about that.I absolutely hate this egalitarian view.You are the boss here and I do not think it is a good idea to just let this roll one-sided. But I made my position clear, that is all I can do.Yeah, but whatever the rule is we have about stalkerish behaviour.SB archive
So what level of attention is allowed then?
The real issue here is that in sexual dynamics men are the ones who have to engage in behavior that will lead to attention from the female, as cringe as SumDrunkGuy behaves, you will not change sexual dynamics by banning the men from the shoutbox.
It is not reasonable in the least to have men bear the responsibility for this alone, there is a kernel of truth from the "women are bad" crowd in that there is no reason for a Person in this forum to tell anyone their sex, there is a reason why avatars and Nicknames exist and saying ones sex does not help in debate, not in GD nor regarding RPGs.
The only purpose for a female to say that they are female is to get attention for that. That the reaction looks like this, in a forum full of unsuccessful men is not only to be expected it is most likely the goal of the women in question. The few times I had the "pleasure" of engaging with theodora in the shoutbox (in which i rarely take part in) always circled around how she gets unwarranted attention from some users while actually engaging in promoting herself sexually to others, i think fluent and atlet were the last discussion.
I do not think it is unwarranted to curb behavior like above with SDG what I do think however is that you DarkUnderlord are better than buying the victim blaming card, women are responsible for their actions and that is including baiting men into this behavior and should face equal repercussions.
At some point you guys really have to ask yourself if this returning "problem" is truly as one-sided as it seems or if this is a gynocentric issue where the men, with their moderation powers, try to protect a woman, who should be capable to do this herself, especially with ignore functions in place.
Yes, I am as uptight regarding this as it seems.
Woman sends signals -> man pursues -> woman decides whether or not to go forward. This is how this stuff works. A man will run the risk of rejection and bear the brunt of it because that's what we do. It's a rough deal but soft deals are for women. Thank god time is working in our favour, as we tend to get more attractive with age, so we have the possibility to just keep trying and trying.
"women are responsible for their actions and that is including baiting men into this behavior and should face equal repercussions" my ass. Men and women aren't equal in this and shouldn't be treated as such. SDG was rejected like millions of guys before him and he is taking it extraordinarily badly, though he like the rest of us knew the deal before he took it. Nothing left to do for him but to move on tbh. Nothing more pathetic in this world than being jealous of female privilege.
EDIT: HeroMarine, why don't you tell us how you met your wife? You mean to tell us that it was her who pursued you instead of the other way around?
absolutely triggered at the idea i would ever "send SDG signals", he joins at least one other codexer on my list of people for whom i'd rather seppuku than so much as have to touch. and the fact that riva can go on for paragraphs about the inherent unfairness of womenfolk, but can't wrap his head around "no means no" is beyond me."women are responsible for their actions and that is including baiting men into this behavior and should face equal repercussions" my ass. Men and women aren't equal in this and shouldn't be treated as such. SDG was rejected like millions of guys before him and he is taking it extraordinarily badly, though he like the rest of us knew the deal before he took it. Nothing left to do for him but to move on tbh. Nothing more pathetic in this world than being jealous of female privilege.
You could start digging an irony mine on this post since it is written as apologia for a tranner.Nothing more pathetic in this world than being jealous of female privilege.
I am just putting my edit here: I mean it could certainly be, that you do not realize what you do, I have seen women claim that all the time, that however reflects badly on your self-image. Maybe you should analyse your own behavior just as you would want a guy like SDG to do.What exactly do you think I've done to encourage SDG to ""flirt"" with me? Spell it out for me, I'm a dumbass after all.
I didn't realise you really thought I was this dumb lol, of course I don't believe that. For someone going on about responsibilities you should understand the difference between those and raw human bullshit.How would it be possible to make you understand how men work, in your world what you wear does not make a difference on how you are percieved. On what level could I make myself understood to a person so unreasonable as to deny their impact in the world?
I'm not saying he isn't lonely, I absolutely think he needs to get help -- for his own sake. But that isn't on me, and I thought DU demonstrated it preeeeeetty clearly that he has a fixation; you presuming that I'm encouraging that based on ... well, nothing, you haven't been there and are just making assumptions, is it not a little arrogant? At least as presumptuous as you're accusing me of being in the whole "u can't understand men!!111" thing. Maybe I can't, but that doesn't mean I'm there for his absurd fixations.I give you *one* more post, as I know this can lead to pointless wall of texts anyways please tell me how you can possibly understand the male perspective on the matter and how you could emphatise with someone like SDG, who clearly not only has problems but is, like many here lonely. Tell me, and I will try my best to make myself understood.
I didn't realise you really thought I was this dumb lol, of course I don't believe that. For someone going on about responsibilities you should understand the difference between those and raw human bullshit.How would it be possible to make you understand how men work, in your world what you wear does not make a difference on how you are percieved. On what level could I make myself understood to a person so unreasonable as to deny their impact in the world?
I'm not saying he isn't lonely, I absolutely think he needs to get help -- for his own sake. But that isn't on me, and I thought DU demonstrated it preeeeeetty clearly that he has a fixation; you presuming that I'm encouraging that based on ... well, nothing, you haven't been there and are just making assumptions, is it not a little arrogant? At least as presumptuous as you're accusing me of being in the whole "u can't understand men!!111" thing. Maybe I can't, but that doesn't mean I'm there for his absurd fixations.I give you *one* more post, as I know this can lead to pointless wall of texts anyways please tell me how you can possibly understand the male perspective on the matter and how you could emphatise with someone like SDG, who clearly not only has problems but is, like many here lonely. Tell me, and I will try my best to make myself understood.
If SDG has complaints about me as a 'female' (lol), he made it pretty clear in that stupid video of his, where he whines about me and mebrilia supposedly getting all the attention (the attention he wants, lol), and in the same breath complains about not being allowed to "hit on" us. I'm quite sure I'd call that "attention", but whatever, you seem to be expecting me to assume equal culpability for the actions of a drunken asshole who blames his problems on everyone else and constantly tries to demand the attention of everyone in the room.
I don't have any questions for you because it's become apparent that your own model of where I'm coming from is as flawed as always, based more on your stereotypes of what you think a feminist is (or whatever you want to brand me as) than what I actually think.
Repercussions for what exactly anyway? Regardless of whether or not Theodora was sending signals (which according to her she wasn't, but I wasn't there), this is a very simple matter of SDG shooting his shot, striking out and now you're here going on about how it's the woman's fault for not offering herself because of "responsibilities" or something.It's not egalitarian in the least, that women and men are not equal is not what I said or meant. But you can ask Theodora what she thinks about that.
You are turning the argument on it's head, saying women should be responsible for their actions is a long staple in all societies besides the egalitarian feminist one.
So what are you arguing for? You think a woman could behave like that without repercussions 200 years ago? I doubt it. With rights comes responsibilities.
Repercussions for what exactly anyway? Regardless of whether or not Theodora was sending signals (which according to her she wasn't, but I wasn't there), this is a very simple matter of SDG shooting his shot, striking out and now you're here going on about how it's the woman's fault for not offering herself because of "responsibilities" or something.It's not egalitarian in the least, that women and men are not equal is not what I said or meant. But you can ask Theodora what she thinks about that.
You are turning the argument on it's head, saying women should be responsible for their actions is a long staple in all societies besides the egalitarian feminist one.
So what are you arguing for? You think a woman could behave like that without repercussions 200 years ago? I doubt it. With rights comes responsibilities.
What behaviour?
offering herself? What are you smoking? Theodora should be equally banned for behavior that leads to shit like this for a roughly equal time.