hexer
Guest
He will bring back the buttons and lead us into the golden age!
Have faith brothers and sisters!
You used the wrong version of the picture, here let me fix it up for you:
He will bring back the buttons and lead us into the golden age!
Have faith brothers and sisters!
You used the wrong version of the picture, here let me fix it up for you:
Because there's all kinds of ratings that people might want, and they each have different meanings. This equals a greater diversity of content, as opposed to the brofist which only results in people posting things that others would agree with/'like'.How so? The buttons system is just an upgraded brofist only system. The result is the same - you have a counter that says how many good boi points you have, except you can't even exchange them for tendies.
The only thing the different ratings achieve is that people will be afraid of negative ratings besides hunting for brofists. That only increases the likelihood of people agreeing with the popular opinion for gbps. If you want diversity of content you have to get rid of the rating system completely.Because there's all kinds of ratings that people might want, and they each have different meanings. This equals a greater diversity of content, as opposed to the brofist which only results in people posting things that others would agree with/'like'.
The only thing the different ratings achieve is that people will be afraid of negative ratings besides hunting for brofists. That only increases the likelihood of people agreeing with the popular opinion for gbps. If you want diversity of content you have to get rid of the rating system completely.
More so given that few of them were unambiguously positive/negative.The only thing the different ratings achieve is that people will be afraid of negative ratings besides hunting for brofists. That only increases the likelihood of people agreeing with the popular opinion for gbps. If you want diversity of content you have to get rid of the rating system completely.
Not arguing in favour of a rating system but plenty of people around here weren't 'afraid' of negative ratings, and some revelled in them.
The only thing the different ratings achieve is that people will be afraid of negative ratings besides hunting for brofists.
You have an extra d there in your word.Every rating system inevitably leads to a community devolving into like whoring.
:citation needed:150 people have to pay jew dollars to get it back.
Start paying up bitches.
I've already paid my fair share.
:shit:As much as I keep reacing to use them, I'm happy to see them gone. People relied on them too much.
:doggie:The only thing the different ratings achieve is that people will be afraid of negative ratings besides hunting for brofists.
The rating system does the exact opposite, actually. Since there are so many ratings, they become relatively meaningless in the bigger context which makes it rather pointless to farm this or that rating. With a single currency, people are encouraged to post stuff with the sole purpose of acquiring precious endorphines.
Besides, some people actively farmed for other kinds of ratings. For example, TemplarGR and Roque actively farmed for retard-ratings.The only thing the different ratings achieve is that people will be afraid of negative ratings besides hunting for brofists.
The rating system does the exact opposite, actually. Since there are so many ratings, they become relatively meaningless in the bigger context which makes it rather pointless to farm this or that rating. With a single currency, people are encouraged to post stuff with the sole purpose of acquiring precious endorphines.
:shit:Ratings are totally gay.
This site acquired its reputation long before even the brofist rating was introduced. Since 2012 only newfags have registered who contribute absolutely nothing to the fight against decline, but instead engage in meaningless political infights and and incite a popularity contest.
To prevent this site sinking completely into irrelevance I suggest 2 last minute measures:
1. remove ratings altogether, thereby preventing members who only used ratings (eg asfasdf)
2. screen every post-2012 registree if they ever posted anything gaming related
This is an internet forum, not a popularity contest.
:big gay:Ratings are totally gay.
This site acquired its reputation long before even the brofist rating was introduced. Since 2012 only newfags have registered who contribute absolutely nothing to the fight against decline, but instead engage in meaningless political infights and and incite a popularity contest.
To prevent this site sinking completely into irrelevance I suggest 2 last minute measures:
1. remove ratings altogether, thereby preventing members who only used ratings (eg asfasdf)
2. screen every post-2012 registree if they ever posted anything gaming related
This is an internet forum, not a popularity contest.
Ratings are totally gay.
This site acquired its reputation long before even the brofist rating was introduced. Since 2012 only newfags have registered who contribute absolutely nothing to the fight against decline, but instead engage in meaningless political infights and and incite a popularity contest.
To prevent this site sinking completely into irrelevance I suggest 2 last minute measures:
1. remove ratings altogether, thereby preventing members who only used ratings (eg asfasdf)
2. screen every post-2012 registree if they ever posted anything gaming related
This is an internet forum, not a popularity contest.
2. screen every post-2012 registree if they ever posted anything gaming related
150 people have to pay jew dollars to get it back.
Start paying up bitches.
I've already paid my fair share.
RIP Templar.Not arguing in favour of a rating system but plenty of people around here weren't 'afraid' of negative ratings, and some revelled in them.