We're the exception in Shun's case. We've a lifetime of friendship backing that, and still we're buddy buddy mostly in private.
It works because our loyalty to Shun is not due to tradition but friendship. It doesn't work in this instance because we're undermining the very power structure that is having these guys serve us in the first place.
And yes, the Scholar is able to interact with Shun in a similar way. But the Scholar is pretty much the antithesis of dogma/faith and is loyal solely due to rationality, unlike these religious zealots.
Good point. I understand the appeal of a casual, free-wheeling approach because that's how Master Yao, Master Zhang, the Grand Taoist, Qi Liuwu and the Abbot interacted with us, but Jing is a free-spirited type, while these people appreciate structure and discipline. Just because Master Zhang didn't give a fuck about formalities so long as we were a bad motherfucker worthy of being his disciple doesn't mean that it's the right approach with these guys. Our past experiences might be blinding us in this regard.
You are their leader, yet you haven't done a single thing for them. Your responsibilites are greater than just enforcing your title.
Make things easier for them - that's the role actually given to us - and their respect will come naturally.
The role wasn't
given to us, we were
chosen for it. I think that's an important distinction; they follow us out of faith and duty, and now that this is our role, we have to jump into it with both feet. Being their leader in this case isn't about what you have or haven't done - the point is that we got here and we have to strive towards the ideal that they have as what a Lord should be. From what little we know of them, a Lord isn't the kind of guy who walks around like an average Joe.
Vairya, for example, told us that just because he follows us does not mean he likes or trusts us. This is not an attitude of a religious fanatic accepting his God blindly. They are not minions, they have minds and opinions of their own. Not entirely unlike Yu.
Alright, Vairya was straight with us and didn't conceal his disappointment that Ahura died and that we replaced him. But come on, the man is most definitely a fanatic! We'd be dead if they weren't! They have opinions of their own, but for the part of Vairya, Vahista and probably Haurvatat and the rest of the Amesha Spenta, they'd probably prefer some semblance of order and stability given how shitty the past few years have been for the Cult.
But I get your point - some people might appreciate the more casual approach as well, and these guys aren't all automatons who exist only to obey the Fire Lord.
They would not mind being guided by a steel hand. Ahura did so, and some of them loved him. But I am not going to run this place as Ahura did, and Yunzi wants to change it, too.
D does not actively break their view of the world like B does, so this is what I am going for.
Ah, but this isn't about what
you want. Leadership is about what
they want. And what they want is a strong leader that they call their Lord. But hey, maybe a gentler way is also possible; Ahura's qi was described many times as being "oppressive" and they could have been chained by his will so long that they've forgotten what freedom feels like.
Leading on merits is always better. We got the title by accident basicaly. We have to earn it in their eyes anyway.
Ah, but we weren't given leadership based on merits, we were
chosen. That is a big difference, because this is a matter of faith, not of rationality, and how we react to it is important. Do we react by becoming the ideal that they expect a Lord to be, or do we just keep testing their patience by just going along with this charade of being just some regular guy?