evdk
comrade troglodyte :M
It's actually called "retards." Bioware has been utilizing it for years.Most companies have the same automated software that generates such replies. FanBot, I think it's called.
It's actually called "retards." Bioware has been utilizing it for years.Most companies have the same automated software that generates such replies. FanBot, I think it's called.
I need no politics bullshit in my favorite gaming site please.http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/19702/gamebanshee-update-on-current-situation
You are my hero...you put it well together. This is a very good example of what is happening in my home country right now (Egypt), how rumors and speculations, and a horrible nasty deceiving media can do. Create conflicts, civilians deaths, chaos, unrest, illegally overthrowing an innocent leader and so on.
The Muslim Brotherhood supports BG:EE
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/19702/gamebanshee-update-on-current-situation
You are my hero...you put it well together. This is a very good example of what is happening in my home country right now (Egypt), how rumors and speculations, and a horrible nasty deceiving media can do. Create conflicts, civilians deaths, chaos, unrest, illegally overthrowing an innocent leader and so on.
The Muslim Brotherhood supports BG:EE
Well shit, now I have to reply.
For what it's worth: I don't have access to this source, I don't know who he or she is, and I don't even know the exact statement given to us. However the supposition that the information is not reliable, accurate or even deceptive as part of some sort of conspiracy against Overhaul Games and/or Atari is patently ludicrous.
Like all such tips the information was provided to us by a source under condition of anonymity; it is fully listed as unconfirmed and nowhere in the news post is it in any way said to be truthful, reliable or to give the full picture into the situation. There's no spin put on the info and as far as I know it's presented as it was received by us. GameBanshee or its writers are not liable for any misinterpretations, whether deliberate or not.
In what arrangement does a developer pay the publisher royalties?
They don't pay them to the publisher, they pay them to the license holder, it's just the same entity in this case. Beyond that I have no idea about the financial arrangements in this relationship.In what arrangement does a developer pay the publisher royalties?
Well shit, now I have to reply.
FYI, I don't know who the source is or how accurate the information is. I would wager it is accurate but incomplete in that it doesn't provide a full picture of what's going on.
My belief is that the terms of the contract between Overhaul and Atari stated that Overhaul would not have to pay royalties until sales exceeded a certain number, perhaps across certain platforms; perhaps there is a discrepancy or difference of interpretation in the contract's terms that is holding things up. I doubt it's as simple as "Overhaul are keeping money they owe to someone else."
True, I wouldn't be surprised if they have to pay something like 60% as royalties... they may fool retards into thinking it's a massive overhauls with shitloads of new stuff, but I doubt that Atari is that dumb.And they're licensing an entire fucking game. I'd be shocked if there weren't massive, punitive royalties involved. Selling mods is a pretty effortless business to be in, really.
Maybe an idea for to screw over Obsidian even more next time they do a Fallout expansion.They don't pay them to the publisher, they pay them to the license holder, it's just the same entity in this case. Beyond that I have no idea about the financial arrangements in this relationship.In what arrangement does a developer pay the publisher royalties?
Maybe an idea for to screw over Obsidian even more next time they do a Fallout expansion.They don't pay them to the publisher, they pay them to the license holder, it's just the same entity in this case. Beyond that I have no idea about the financial arrangements in this relationship.In what arrangement does a developer pay the publisher royalties?
Rumors, hearsay, internet gossip... not worthy of codex news. Also Gamebanshee publishing this shit without verified sources...
My belief is that the terms of the contract between Overhaul and Atari stated that Overhaul would not have to pay royalties until sales exceeded a certain number, perhaps across certain platforms; perhaps there is a discrepancy or difference of interpretation in the contract's terms that is holding things up. I doubt it's as simple as "Overhaul are keeping money they owe to someone else."
Rumors, hearsay, internet gossip... not worthy of codex news. Also Gamebanshee publishing this shit without verified sources...
'Sup Trent?
*high five*
I just dislike this type of "journalism", if you consider internet gaming sites new sources that is. I've dealt with unscrupulous newspaper editors before when i wrote for a political blog, some verified their sources before publishing, a lot of them just run with what "sounds" better on the headline without much regard to the fallout.
:hurrdurr: What does he have to hide by being anonymous?The source isn't anonymous to GameBanshee. They just can't reveal his or her name.