Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Incline Of the Big Three, which is your favorite? (Fallout, PS:T, Arcanum)

Which one is the greatest (listed in chronological order of release)?

  • Fallout

  • Planescape: Torment

  • Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magicka Obscura


Results are only viewable after voting.

FriendlyMerchant

Guest
Arcanum is not RTwP. It is either Real time or Turnbased. Spacebar can be used to switch between the TB and RT modes. The TB mode is pretty much just Fallout's combat system with a different action point system, magic, and
Still shit.
And yet it's still just Fallout with more stuff.
By that logic, a pizza is just bread with more stuff on it. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts, and your crude reductionist bullshit isn't going to fly here just because you want to disingenuously pretend that FO's combat is in the same ballpark as Underrail. You're such a dipshit it's hilarious.

And? Then again, I can take a certain trait and only have about 4 perks before finishing. But the number of perks is just how far the game extends the leveling system and it's length. Kinda like what Fallout 2 did. Longer game with more levels = more perks. Also the apt comparison is pathfinder 1e to D&D 3.0. Pf1e is just D&D3.5. Except the classes have a few more bells and whistles on top of the classes taken directly from D&D3.5 and you get a feat ever second level instead of every third regardless of class. So with a non-fighter, you cap out at about 7-8 feats given a generic class while you have more like 10-11 in Pf1e.
The point is that Underrail has many different "builds" that are possible as a result of the sheer number of feats in the game that have a significant impact. Do you want to play a glass cannon psyker? Go right ahead, and while you do so, feel free to choose between the countless different psychic archetypes that range from using melting people's brains with your mind to launching balls of fire and ice with your thermic control. Do you want to play a stealthy sniper rifle, where you set up traps on the battlefield to stack the deck more favorably for yourself, while also manuevering to the perfect position so you can pick your enemies off one by one, retreating tactically until they are all dead without even laying a finger on you? You can do that. Heavily armored, sledgehammer wielding tank that throws grenades at his feet? Check. Agile hoplite that can throw his spear over long distances for extra range and massive damage, while also being relatively tanky? Check. Chemical weapon specialist, with the ability to fill a battlefield full of noxious gas? Check. Spec ops commando, mowing enemies down room by room with none the wiser? Check. The list really goes on.

Contrast this with fallout? Where the builds can literally be summed up as melee, sniper, or heavy gunner. Combat is also braindead easy, so it's not like any of these choices are actually meaningful. Underrail dwarfs FO in terms of the sheer amount of builds you can play that are actually good at doing the thing you set out to do with them, versus just being some niche meme build. It also offers countless different encounters and enemy types that are made possible due to the sheer amount of these feats, which could never happen in FO.
Rather than having the ability to target specific parts of the body in the beginning like Fallout, Underrail instead allows certain things like Beheading with the Sword or Dirty only when you take the feat.
Have you even played the fucking game? Beheading doesn't work anything like FO's targeting system. You really don't have any idea what the fuck you're talking about?
The rest is mostly cooldown reduction, ap reduction, damage increase, number increases, etc. kinda like FO
This is such a gross mischaracterization and simplification of Underrail's feats. The difference between FO's feats and Underrail's feats is that while FO's feats are like you described, simple improvements to numbers and stats, Underrail's feats take this to a whole new level by making feats very specific and requiring a certain set of conditions to be met so that the great benefits can be felt. Take a feat such as survival instincts, which increases crit chance when below thirty percent health. While yes, this involves "number increases", it implements them in such a way that instantly changes how your character is going to be played. It adds a whole new dimension to a build, and forces you to either spec into extreme damage resistance and tankiness to compensate for the low health, or forms of crowd control/damage avoidance. What about ambush, which increases accuracy and crit chance when attacking a target that is illuminated while you are in the shadows. Once again, a "number increase", but done in a way that dramatically changes how you play your character and how you approach different fights. Or, we can talk about Thermodynamicity, which gives an ap reduction when alternating between hot and cold metathermic psionic abilities. If you really can't see the difference between FO's implementations of perks and Underrail's feats, you're a lost cause.
Fallout also did this with certain thinks like implants or the "childkiller" trait.
Childkiller is a reputation that you get, not a trait, and it literally just effects reaction and spawns in bounty hunters. This has nothing to do with in game feats that effect how a build is played and/or the types of damage you deal. Implants are literally just +1 stat bonuses, which again has nothing to do with feats/perks. You're retarded.
Like Fallout which has skill and attribute requirements for feats, weapons, and skill checks (dialogue checks are not advertised in dialogue). Besides, where did you think Styg got the idea from? Not Neverwinter Nights. He got it from Fallout because he wanted to make a game like Fallout with more stuff in it. The game plays like Fallout. But with more bells and whistles. It would be retarded to deny this.
I never said Styg didn't get many ideas from FO. Underrail's system was inspired by FO and I never denied this. What I said was.
I'm not going to let you get away with grossly simplifying Underrail's combat system in so many ways so that you can claim it is functionally the same as FO's combat system. Anyone who has played these two games can see the much higher levels of depth and complexity that are present in Underrail versus FO
Something can be inspired by something else, but then proceed to improve upon it and add so many different things to it that it reaches a new level of depth and complexity that the original did not have. Underrail does everything FO does, but better. And it does them significantly better in meaningful ways. You're a faggot ass fanboy however, so you pretend that it's just a few "bells and whistles", when in reality the two games play very differently.

These newfags get worse and worse every year. This dumbass has NMA reject written all over him.
You've provided no counterarguments. You've only agreed with what I already said and at best nitpicked over what a specific perk/trait is labeled as. Enjoy being retarded.
 
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Messages
2,964
Fallout, never actually played Planscape, maybe only D&D game I have never played. Hate the planscape setting, don't care about the 'planes' or gods or any of that shit, bores me to tears, and the stupid looking talking skull character just made it even easier to avoid all these years.
 

Ladonna

Arcane
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
10,823
Almost an impossible thing to answer.

I love all three, but with that said, I remember loving Fallout, but thinking after I had finished it, that it was like a souped up but heavily shortened Wasteland. The story had a similar arc, but the game and locations seemed much smaller to me, and the game seemed too short. Now I just think it was a good thing that I was left thirsting for more, but that is just how I felt at the time. I didn't replay the game many times because of the severe effort it took to keep damn Dogmeat alive. It still chills me every time I think of replaying it.

Torment was a wildcard purchase. I still remember the totally crazy video about the game that piqued my interest while installing the Baldur's Gate expansion pack.



The game itself blew me away. What a great, but strange, experience. Most of the combat was largely forgettable, but the story and locations made up for it. I did replay the game once, optimizing my character so that I could complete things like Dak'kons circles, and other obscure things I heard about after completing it the first time (I never found the Modron guy the first time either). I will have to play it through again one day.

Out of the three, I have replayed Arcanum the most. The first time was a very buggy experience, but I pushed on, missing a lot of content I found in later playthroughs. I loved having the different ways of accomplishing things, through magic or tech (or the brute force "idiot" run, which while short, was hilarious). I loved finding new ways to use skills, spells and items. Finding all sorts of odd things off the beaten track. And turning the whole "chosen one" story on it's head. The ending did also genuinely throw me off the first time, finding out I was chasing a Red Herring (again), something that CRPG's don't normally succeed in doing for me.

So, out of the three, I would have to pick Arcanum. It isn't easy, because all three are part of the magic I had finding worthy games after a lot of the 90's were, to me, terrible. But Arcanum was the high point (a clunky highpoint in some ways, with some regression from the slick interfaces that came before) and, unfortunately, also the start point of the "Decline" that was to come about after it's release. Black Isle died, Bioware became Biowhore, and Troika, after releasing two more great but flawed games, fell off a cliff, with Arcanum: Journey to the centre of the Earth never to be seen.
 

Humanophage

Arcane
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
5,065
In PST, you are on TNO's journey and everything else simply serves as a vehicle for this narrative. As a simple example: How many side quests can you remember from PST if you haven't replayed it recently? I remember enjoying them, but if I was forced to name some at gunpoint, I'd be fucked.
I probably liked P:T even more for showcasing the setting. It is also one of the rare RPGs in an almost entirely urban setting, and an inventive one at that.

With regards to side quests, the division into the main quest and the side quests was less strict in P:T. You don't really separate the main story from the rest, and the reward is often some additional spin on the story. For example, I am not sure if the Siege Tower is an obligatory location. The bit where you acquire Nordom is sort of a side quest, but there is no point in avoiding this since it's a major party member. The fact that those quests come at you in an unexpected fashion rather than "go to place X to advance plot" is to the credit of the game.
 

0sacred

poop retainer
Patron
Joined
Feb 12, 2021
Messages
1,412
Location
MFGA (Make Fantasy Great Again)
Codex Year of the Donut
The RTwP combat plays like shit with harm being broken and the TB combat didn't feel much better. Of course, I will add the caveat that the version of Arcanum I played was not working correctly, which one again circles back to my point that it's broken and bugged.
Harm isn't even broken. It's more of a mem, a bait, don't fall for it and repeat what others say all the time. Clearly you didn't play the game enough for yourself to judge. It's like saying neural overload is broken un UR because you can go through the entire game with it (you can't even do that with harm because it doesn't work vs all enemies and you won't be able to kite everyone in rt either). As the Merchant said, tech problems are on your end. Some people play and enjoy it even w/o patches (mods).

didn't Harm cause your alignment meter to drop? That's a pretty cool way to balance things IMO.
 

Devastator

Learned
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
216
Location
Chaotic Neutral
I voted for Fallout because:
  • It has nice beaches
    jrYMU8O.jpeg
  • You can dress up in robes and imagine to perform rituals on dead aliens
    xKNqkvR.jpg
  • Trolling Butch Harris is fun
    Tk5Qb3v.jpg
 

Beans00

Augur
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
985
Underrail dwarfs FO in terms of the sheer amount of builds you can play


Well you can't play Underrail as a pacifist whereas fallout gives you the option. So... Yeah I guess in terms of ways to kill scorpions Underrail has fallout beat.

You also can't interact with Tchort in any way. Which broke my heart playing it because I believe Tchort was clearly innocent and wronged by the faceless. In fallout you can convince the master to end his plan and destroy himself. He is given depth, you see his motivation and reasons. You are given multiple solutions to deal with him. You can do the underrail thing and kill him. You can convince him or you can set off a non strategic nuclear warhead.

What option does tchort get? Kill him with mind magic? Kill him with a sub machine gun? Kill him with a hammer? Kill him with a knife? Kill him with a shotgun? Kill him with fists? Kill him with chemical pistols? Kill him with energy pistols? Kill him with mechanical pistols? Kill him with assault rifles? Kill him with crossbows?

What vindication did Tchort ever get? He was scientists clearly working for the betterment of mankind before a bunch of violent brutes forced him to mutate. These violent brutes later murder dozens, maybe hundreds of people near CORE city and the railyard and then are painted as hero's. 'They're only mean because tchort aka society made them that way'.

BULLSHIT. The faceless are thugs, and thieves because they choose to be and want to be. Did anyone ever stop and think tchort may need the cube to survive? Did anyone ever notice all the good the institute of tchort did for the underrail? How good their soundtrack was? They gave me fair warning before going to the west wing. They gave me good experience and rewards. They sold me great items at fair prices.

Yet we are told 'these guys who murdered all these people at the rail yard and who attack you in a cave in core city' are good guys, and 'these guys who are nice to you and help you whenever you interact with them are bad'.

Not even going into all the propaganda against the protectorate, who are clearly a justifiable organization with mostly well meaning people. Although anarchists and criminals clearly wont see it that way. I gassed the free drones, deal with it.



I hope in underrail infusion we continue to see the entirety of south underrail choke on their own vomit. They don't deserve Tchort, or Biocorp, or the protectorate and I enjoyed watching them suffer.
 

Ryan muller

Educated
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
162
Fallout 2 is much better than all of those.

But between those, its fo1

Ps:t is good because of its writing and it certainly standa strong on its on due to how greatly you can shape your character's mentality and how more in depth side quests are compared to other 2, but combat sucks and its not Very replayable compared to arcanum or fo1, i also stopped caring about it since Disco elysium released.


Arcanum is underwhelming. Lots of great ideas, shitty execution. I cant forgive how buggy and broken the game is, the system is also not fun at all, played this blind and my build sucked because to make it work, most builds are way too point expensive and it takes a lot of knowledge to do that. I mean, hell to make a gunner work you need PE (which no other build needs), DX, STR and a bunch of inteligence to get the crafting right, you also need throwing for the early game, points in the tech trees for both the guns you need AND healing items as virgyl's spells wont work after a time. May i remind you, you only get 1 point by level and 2 at each 5. Its a nightmare

Then you mix it with the fact that the combat is one of the most horrible ones in existence, how slow paced the plot is and how grindy the game gets once you reach the black mountain mines and see you have no way of progressing without grinding and there you have it, 4/10
 

Beastro

Arcane
Joined
May 11, 2015
Messages
8,089
It's interesting that although Fallout clearly is the popular choice for favorite, it's the Arcanum fans who seem to be the most passionate about their choice.
While we're on the topic of Arcanum, does anyone with cable still know if Virgil's voice actor is doing promo's for ABC?



Have to admit, it was really bloody weird hearing him do those for the first time.
 

Shaki

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
1,580
Location
Hyperborea
Arcanum is underwhelming. Lots of great ideas, shitty execution. I cant forgive how buggy and broken the game is, the system is also not fun at all, played this blind and my build sucked because to make it work, most builds are way too point expensive and it takes a lot of knowledge to do that. I mean, hell to make a gunner work you need PE (which no other build needs), DX, STR and a bunch of inteligence to get the crafting right, you also need throwing for the early game, points in the tech trees for both the guns you need AND healing items as virgyl's spells wont work after a time. May i remind you, you only get 1 point by level and 2 at each 5. Its a nightmare

Noo, game actually requires some thinking and you can't just randomly click attributes like in PoE, and still get godlike character!!!!!!

Another faggot filtered by prestigious system, another proof that Arcanum is #1 of all time :incline:
 

Ryan muller

Educated
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
162
Arcanum is underwhelming. Lots of great ideas, shitty execution. I cant forgive how buggy and broken the game is, the system is also not fun at all, played this blind and my build sucked because to make it work, most builds are way too point expensive and it takes a lot of knowledge to do that. I mean, hell to make a gunner work you need PE (which no other build needs), DX, STR and a bunch of inteligence to get the crafting right, you also need throwing for the early game, points in the tech trees for both the guns you need AND healing items as virgyl's spells wont work after a time. May i remind you, you only get 1 point by level and 2 at each 5. Its a nightmare

Noo, game actually requires some thinking and you can't just randomly click attributes like in PoE, and still get godlike character!!!!!!

Another faggot filtered by prestigious system, another proof that Arcanum is #1 of all time :incline:

shitty point, balancing things out =\= making everything equal

This is poorly done regardless.
Having enough feedback to know what you have to do doesnt even work when half of the skills are garbage in game and the game OBVIOUSLY wont point out to something being garbage.

And this is not even true since everybody who put one point at the "harm spell" doesnt even need to have a brain.

But if you like such a garbage system that makes you distribute points like its the last thing you do in your life, you do you.

Fallout came before and destroys that shitty ruleset.
 
Last edited:

Goldschmidt

Learned
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
461
Location
Swen Vincke's bedroom (Ghent)
Fallout is the inferior predecessor of Path of Exile and hence wins. Think about that one.
Arcanum is the american version of Divine Divinity but with worst combat possible.
PST is a satire on 90s style rpgs that obviously doesn't take itself seriously but ironically is taken
very seriously by the codex elite who thinks it is the finest literature.

My dick stays limp though; I'd rather play a tabletop game. Or if I am forced to take a videogame: Legend of Grimrock.
Some of you fags need to replay them instead of drooling over your 2 decade old 'cock-ring' cd-roms.
 

Falksi

Arcane
Joined
Feb 14, 2017
Messages
10,589
Location
Nottingham
I'd honestly have to replay them again to give a proper verdict, but as it is I'd pick P:T, simply because what it does well it does supremely well.

And Baldur's Gate 2 should make this the big 4. I'd pick that over all 3 of those suggested.
 

ResetRPG

Novice
Joined
Jul 17, 2022
Messages
35
Out of the choices, Planescape Torment.

If I could choose freely, I'd put Baldur's Gate 2 above all.
 

Haplo

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
6,181
Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
Hard to judge between Fallout and PST. I love them both. Personally I rate PST a bit higher, because its setting is so unique and because of the in-depth party interactions and bonds with the companions, which even have gameplay consequences. Also because of the cool jrpg high level spells that don't care about balance. And Missile of Patience. Combat was not challenging, complicated or balanced, but I still found it fun. Similar to Fallout, really - with its one-of-a-kind critical hit effect tables and gib animations - noone ever made the crits half as cool - as they were in the classic Fallouts.

Also I agree, Arcanum, while was very creative and also had a very cool setting and atmosphere, does not deserve to be anywhere near the top position. Combat in that game was a trainwreck, probably worst I have ever experienced.
 
Last edited:

Konjad

Patron
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
4,069
Location
Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
For me, PST > Fallout >>>> BG 2 (if we were including it) >>>>>>> Arcanum.
It's not even storytardation, since BG2 doesn't have a good story. BG2 focuses entirely on DRAMA. Look how bad he treats you! Look, all your party members have emotional issues! Look, the big bad man is also an emotional wreckage!

Behead all drama tards.

BG was way better than BG2 because it focused on adventure and exploration.


As for the topic, Arcanum is my favorite RPG, and my second favorite is Prelude to Darkness, which is basically Arcanum in a dark fantasy setting instead of steampunk.

Planescape Torment does have the best story and quests of them all, probably the most memorable RPG (and had some depressing stories and moments without going retarded drama like BG2).

Fallout was a great game, but it's at the point where I start to think there are other just as good or even better games, like Gothic.
 

Nifft Batuff

Prophet
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
3,204
Torment was a wildcard purchase. I still remember the totally crazy video about the game that piqued my interest while installing the Baldur's Gate expansion pack.
I remember watching this trailer from the Fallout 2 CD.

Then, after playing Fallout 2, I started Baldur's Gate and I remember immediatly saying to myself "What is this shit?"
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom