They can not create, only desecrate and destroy
Well, yeah. They even happily admit it, they just call it deconstructing. WE MUST DECONSTRUCT <THING>!
They can not create, only desecrate and destroy
iirc he's bulgarian or hungarian or somesuch living thereSoul is offensive as some beings like g*rmans do not have one, please use a different word.
I wonder how JarlFrank feels about him ranking equally to a Ginger.
iirc he's bulgarian or hungarian or somesuch living thereSoul is offensive as some beings like g*rmans do not have one, please use a different word.
I wonder how JarlFrank feels about him ranking equally to a Ginger.
He's German that wants to move to Bulgaria as far as I know. I've been friends with him for 6 years now and he's always wanted to move out of Gaymany.
iirc he's bulgarian or hungarian or somesuch living thereSoul is offensive as some beings like g*rmans do not have one, please use a different word.
I wonder how JarlFrank feels about him ranking equally to a Ginger.
He's German that wants to move to Bulgaria as far as I know. I've been friends with him for 6 years now and he's always wanted to move out of Gaymany.
Are the feet better in Bulgaria or something?
No, the real problem with the Alphabet Workers Union is that it’s not a union. It’s rather a “minority union”—essentially an employee pressure group, formed through the Communication Workers of America (CWA). The traditional organizing process through the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) requires majority approval, a long, fraught, and fragile process, but one that results in actual bargaining power with management. A minority union, by contrast, can be formed by a very “small activist base”. According to the Wall Street Journal, the “Alphabet Workers Union is composed of fewer than 800 workers among Alphabet’s roughly 250,000 employees and contractors, some of whom are technically employed by completely separate entities, some of which are already unionized.” And their formation as a “union” does not give them any negotiation power, though they do pay dues to CWA.
[...]
The demands described in the Times article certainly seem quite different from the traditional bread-and-butter workplace demands. Tech workers gravitate toward things like banning Trump from their platforms and gender and racial equity within their companies, two demands to which many Silicon Valley executives are probably quite sympathetic—unlike, of course, higher wages, the imposition of “just cause” for discharge, a binding workplace grievance procedure, contractually mandated shop-floor rights, and ultimately more democratic control over the workplace. In the case of demands for informal and extralegal tech censorship over ideologues like Trump, insofar they result in the narrowing of the space for the exercise of civic liberties as a whole, one might even deem this expression of workplace “antagonism” a kind of class collaboration.
https://damagemag.com/2021/02/10/the-pmc-gets-organized/
It still amuses me that with Pathfinder 1e Paizo successfully catered to the grognards who hated that the next edition of D&D made all their expensive books outdated and no longer supported, only for Pathfinder 2e doing the exact same thing. I wonder who's gonna pick up the slack next.
Social progress, racial justice and LGBTQ+ issues are what real unions are all about. Those poor people unions that don't do this are for racist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, black supermacyphobic, Trudeauphobic and even jewphobic losers. They're basically just a bunch of nazi white supremacists pretending to be leftist while they abuse their kids by misgendering them and promoting illegal hatespeech.PMC unions aren't real unions. They're just there to push SJWism and other activist bullshit on their employers.
Helveczia!RPGs?
There's overall more Slav blood in me than Germanic if we go back to my grandparent generation.
I have to admit that 4e encounters were fun and easy to put together. An adventure would be 3-4 combat encounters, 1-2 skill challenges, and a boss fight. You could make the combat encounters plus or minus one or two challenge levels for your characters. Add more 1-hp minions and dangerous terrain to give your controller a fun encounter. Add more brutes to give the defender and striker a fun time. The boss fight would usually end up being a slog, so I'd reduce the boss' hp a little so I would stop delaying the inevitable. As much as we love to complain about 4e, I had some good times with it.
One of my complaints about 4e is how obvious the optimal builds are. Prior editions had allowed for crazy builds and surprising freeform emergent gameplay. 4e was pretty strictly the format I described in the paragraph above, so the game became the metagame of optimizing your characters to beat the game, and every level-up and every combat round came with an obvious "right" choice of what you were supposed to do. And it felt like if you made a suboptimal character, you were just slowing down the adventure.
Also, it's always a good time to tell people how much RPG.net sucks. This discussion right here would have banned everyone for multiple reasons if it had occurred under the thought-police RPGnet mods. Fat-shaming, gender realism, and disparaging unions would probably get us all banned. Even discussion of D&D edition pros/cons is forbidden because it reignites "edition warring."
Oh, and just so you know: You. Yeah, you personally. You. Your favorite edition of D&D sucks. And you're fat.
It's well worth it to get in touch with the well educated and knowledgeable racists and hear their takes.yeah it means dealing some ignorant racists
I'm surprised to learn that PMC unions actually confer them any benefit whatsoever. I always figured it was performative thing. I guess it still is, it's not like Paizo's management is going to object to more poz.In the case of demands for informal and extralegal tech censorship over ideologues like Trump, insofar they result in the narrowing of the space for the exercise of civic liberties as a whole, one might even deem this expression of workplace “antagonism” a kind of class collaboration.