Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

RPG Codex and Quarter To Three

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,658
Location
Behind you.
Kind of makes me wonder if he isn't lying about being banned at NMA as well then. He's never even registered here, which means he's clearly never been banned here. One is kind of required for the other.

The funny thing is, after he got all pissy about me bringing up that people enjoy scat porn, he emailed me about it. Something about how he DEMANDS RESPECT or something when I think the analogy is pretty clear that some people have odd preferences. I replied something sarcastic about, "Well, I DEMAND A DEGREE OF INTELLIGENCE." or something to that effect. Anyway, he emailed Kreegle about how I should be kicked off DAC staff for insulting him. We both laughed about that.

It's kind of funny for someone to DEMAND RESPECT when they're later willing to spew forth complete bullshit about other sites. I'm pretty sure most people are aware that RPG Codex has a fairly liberal policy on banning. We ban the shit out of spambots, but that's about it.
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,357
I can remember going to Quarter To Three in defense of the "27 Things about FOBOS" article I wrote explaining how the game would be crap. I remember having to deal with the same old "but u haven't played it yet!!1!" argument. Needless to say, we all know how FOBOS turned out in the end.
 

Jason

chasing a bee
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
10,737
Location
baby arm fantasy island
I was once banned for my shockingly good looks and my in-your-face sexuality. No matter how much they beg, I'm never going to work at that daycare center again.
 

mathboy

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 21, 2004
Messages
666
Saint_Proverbius said:
Kind of makes me wonder if he isn't lying about being banned at NMA as well then. He's never even registered here, which means he's clearly never been banned here. One is kind of required for the other.

Simple, you deleted his profile.

If you look around for guest posts you might find it.

(If you don't want to look, it's right here: http://www.rpgcodex.com/phpBB/viewtopic ... 274#238274 )
 

mathboy

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 21, 2004
Messages
666
There seems to be a bug in the forums, when I found it it clearly was in the General Fallout Discussion forum!

And it was dated 23/11/1999!
 

voodoo1man

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 10, 2003
Messages
568
Location
Icy Highlands of Canada
Saint_Proverbius said:
Rhombus said:
Fallout Tactics was never a console game...

... and that leads me to think he's talking about Fobos, in which case I would have banned him aswell.

Rob Merritt's never even registered here.

You should invite him to be an honorary moderator here or something. That will make him eat his words.

Saint_Proverbius said:
I'm pretty sure most people are aware that RPG Codex has a fairly liberal policy on banning. We ban the shit out of spambots, but that's about it.

Liberal? That's what you'd like to think. You're all really neo-conservatives in disguise. While I may not need Internet mail-order brides or car repair in the greater Moscow area, I will defend to the death the right of automated computer scripts to market these services to me!

baby arm said:
QT3 isn't any more of a hivemind than we are. They've got more Bio fanboys than we do, but Volourn makes up for that on our end. And we get our share of Oblivion defenders here, while they have Desslock. Overall, it's just another group of nerds arguing about games, like the Codex.

You see, this is the kind of liberal bullshit hippie attitude that is ruining the elite status of our vaunted community.
 

voodoo1man

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 10, 2003
Messages
568
Location
Icy Highlands of Canada
baby arm said:
Hey man, just be cool and we'll all hang out and touch each other's souls and stuff.

Wait, you're still in school, right? Sure, touch each other, that sounds good. I'll give you a call. Do you have a webcam? Can you email me some photos of yourself? On the beach? Not wearing a shirt?

PS - While we're busy emailing each other homoerotic photos, why don't we send this Desslock character some tubgirls. I'm sure that will brighten up his day and maybe his opinion of the Codex will improve.
 

Jason

chasing a bee
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
10,737
Location
baby arm fantasy island
"Wait, you're still in school, right?"
No, I wish. College is the Good Life, no doubt. But the webcam might be a good idea. Supplemental income and all that.

"why don't we send this Desslock character some tubgirls"
Tubgirl is so last month. These days, Machu Picchu Man is where it's at.
 

Section8

Cipher
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
4,321
Location
Wardenclyffe
Tubgirl is so last month. These days, Machu Picchu Man is where it's at.

What you really want is penile and testicular mutilation with hypodermic needles:

http://www.moast.com/image/87500.jpg

...and upwards. There's a whole series of images, but it's pretty horrible shit so I don't know how far the series goes. I'm not even game to see if the link still works or not.

But consider it a generous gift to the arsenal of the Codex's shock troopers.
 

Hazelnut

Erudite
Joined
Dec 17, 2002
Messages
1,490
Location
UK
Just a quickie,

Is all this 'I can find more discusting pictures than you can, ner ner ner ner ner!' stuff that goes on here simply testostorone fueled macho bullshit, or is there something deeper going on....?

It's just that I equate macho bullshit more with the less intelligent end of the spectrum, which doesn't seem to apply here. Hence the confusion.
 

Jason

chasing a bee
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
10,737
Location
baby arm fantasy island
You're making the false assumption that an intelligent person can't have "macho bullshit" and/or "less intelligent" aspects of their personality. Every man I know, and many women, can have Beavis & Butthead moments no matter how intelligent they are. It's a little gift from God or something. "Go forth...and be stupid!"
 

Elwro

Arcane
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
11,747
Location
Krakow, Poland
Divinity: Original Sin Wasteland 2
Hazelnut said:
Is all this 'I can find more discusting pictures than you can, ner ner ner ner ner!' stuff that goes on here simply testostorone fueled macho bullshit, or is there something deeper going on....?
Of course it's something deeper.

The subject of the thread is interpolated into expressionism that includes sexuality as a reality. Therefore, it is contextualised into a predialectic theory that includes sexuality as a whole.
 

sheek

Arbiter
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
8,659
Location
Cydonia
Elwro said:
Hazelnut said:
Is all this 'I can find more discusting pictures than you can, ner ner ner ner ner!' stuff that goes on here simply testostorone fueled macho bullshit, or is there something deeper going on....?
Of course it's something deeper.

The subject of the thread is interpolated into expressionism that includes sexuality as a reality. Therefore, it is contextualised into a predialectic theory that includes sexuality as a whole.

Only representationally of course.
 

Section8

Cipher
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
4,321
Location
Wardenclyffe
I'm basically sharing my childlike wonder at just what you can find on the internet without actually looking for it.
 

Hazelnut

Erudite
Joined
Dec 17, 2002
Messages
1,490
Location
UK
Fair enough. Would it allow me to join in if I was to post photos of the amazing creations of my youngest's arse? Honestly, some of then look positively sculpted or maybe even architected, although they're still fucking revolting being just a turd after all. I somehow can't stop myself from looking as I transport them, in the potty rather than my hands i hasten to add, from the lounge to the toilet... and i'd be happy to share the wonder if you like. :twisted:
 

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,658
Location
Behind you.
Briosafreak said:
We never heard of him, there's no Rob Merritt registered at NMA. Maybe he used some other nick.

He uses Rob_Merritt on all the sites I've seen him on. He was that on DAC, TA, and so on.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom