Jaesun
Fabulous Ex-Moderator
New Vegas in the top ten. As. I. predicted.
And you also did not vote, so we could laugh at your selection of cRPG's while you continue to shitpost with no reference.
New Vegas in the top ten. As. I. predicted.
FIFYHey, the objective was to take out the popamole games of the list. Why is Dark Souls in the top 50? I suspect a weaboo conspiracy in here.
Nope, it's extremely easy to do so:Was it really that hard to create a text list? How is the codex supposed to get search engine hits when everything is in image format?
A typo.And wihtout further ado
Magnum opus, I think.MCA's magnus opus
Nice Wallpaper. I will return later and fist this.
Cool Graph of INCLINE:
Finally, here's a cool graph of all the 223 games voted, displaying the INCLINE throughout the years. Here you can see the number of games released, their total points and the average of points per year since 1979!
You're right, I screwed up the formula.On that matter, I don't quite understand the average score for companies, numbers don't seem to add up.
Judging by points vs votes rating the only thing the new system achieved is getting Wiz8 on the Top10 (well, that and a bit of shuffle among the top5, but who cares really). Now if you sort the list by highest average, that's when things really start to get interestig. Which make me think that those who suggested a "rate every game you've played" system were probably right.
Exactly. One thing is to ask people to give points to their favorite games, the other is to rank every goddamn RPG they played. Not only that takes A LOT of time and effort that not everyone will put into it, but is a system that does not properly show how much people like the game and encourages trolling & down-voting. Regardless of its merits, a game like Dragon Age: Origins would never make into the top because a lot of people would give it 1/10 or something like that, forcing the average down. In the end, that "rate every game you've played" system is nice in theory, but would be absolute shit in practice.Not to mention that ranking and evaluating are two very distinct processes. One might give the same mark to two games, but be absolutely outraged that one is considered better than the other.
It's not that anything stops anyone from using a "minimum number of votes" barrier for that matter. Even if we take only the games from the current Top50 that have at least 100 votes thrown at them and rearrange them by average instead of total, that'll be a drastically different Top15 (a much better one in my opinion).Judging by points vs votes rating the only thing the new system achieved is getting Wiz8 on the Top10 (well, that and a bit of shuffle among the top5, but who cares really). Now if you sort the list by highest average, that's when things really start to get interestig. Which make me think that those who suggested a "rate every game you've played" system were probably right.
Nope.
Not if you don't take into account the number of votes. I find a shitty RPG nobody voted for, give it 10/10. It's number 1 on the list.
Not to mention that ranking and evaluating are two very distinct processes. One might give the same mark to two games, but be absolutely outraged that one is considered better than the other.
That's a nice slip. I completely agree .In the end, that "rate every game you've played" system is nice in theory, but would be absolute hit in practice.