Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review Sacred reviewed at DeadAlfs


Staff Member
Jun 16, 2002
Behind you.
Tags: Sacred

<A href="http://www.deadalfs.co.uk/">DeadAlfs</a> has posted <A href="http://www.deadalfs.co.uk/reviews/1482/">a review</a> of <A href="http://www.sacred-game.com">Sacred</a> giving it a <b>7/10</b>, saying it's not his cup of tea in terms of RPGs. Of course, he also says <A href="http://www.blizzard.com/diablo/">Diablo</a> isn't a CRPG, even though he's never played it. So, he's one of those. Anyway, here's a clip:
<blockquote>I can’t punish Sacred for not being everything I want in an RPG. It was written for a very specific audience within a fairly tight budget (If the narration and NPC interaction is anything to go by). Aside from a few balancing issues it’s a solid and engaging action adventure with an admirable feature list. It’s no KotOR, but if the Diablo fans are lapping Sacred up, it surely MUST be worth a look…</blockquote>
I'm not entirely sure they are lapping it up right now.

Spotted at: <A HREF="http://www.bluesnews.com">Blue's News</A>

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Top Bottom