Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

So why aren't Elder Scrolls or any rpgs made using the procedural tech that FUEL used?

Dedicated_Dark

Dedicated_Dark

Arbiter
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
962
Location
Beyond the Grave
If you remember FUEL, that barren apocalyptic racing game with nothing to do... .It has quite a detailed and varied world. If we can use that tech wouldn't it be much easier, rather than wasting time on making wilderness they can devote the time to build detailed cities and complex interactions. The tech is quite amazing, it would make it possible for us to have another Dagerfall but more alive.

ok ... .forget bethesda. Why the fuck isn't anyone else using it? I want my more worthless rpgs with endless abyss to explore while having complex mechanics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18yI3D5XChs

Put the speed to 2x and watch it atleast till the 15min mark before you spout some rubbish on how everything will look like shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom