Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate The Baldur's Gate Series Thread

Sunsetspawn

Arcane
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
1,046
Location
New York
So I finally decided to fire up BG2: Shadows of Amn and I'd like to post thoughts here. These past few years have left me bored with most modern gaming, so I've been playing classics that I'd never touched before to see if they really are what they're claimed to be, or if nostalgia has blinded everybody.

First thoughts...

So, I have a big selection of spells with the magethief and the druidfighter when I fire up the spell toolbar, which is fine. I understand that starting me with a few simple spells would violate the story and I'm a storygameplay fag. Nothing fucks my suspension of disbelief faster than gameplay violating lore; that shit is dildos. Anyhow, the fact that I can't right-click on spells in the bar to get a description is fucking criminal. I don't know what your goofy little symbols represent yet, except for the ones with arrows because hurr derr direct attack spell, so I need to read about them...

a lot. So instead I have to open the goddamned cookbook all the time.

On to problem 2. What the fuck are those Paladin abilities I have? What book has those? I chose an Inquisitor because my experience on here tells me that the mages are going to be motherfuckers, so it was either that or Wizard Slayer. So my Inquisitor has special spell-like abilities on the task bar, and I'll be fucked if I can find a description of them anywhere. The only descriptions I can find are of the two that are unique to the Inquisitor.

Whatever, there's plenty to like, but bitching is where it's at, son. Post more tomorrow, gotta get sleep.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
14,231
The extra abilities on your bar are innate bhallspawn abilities. They mirror low level mage and cleric spells. Most of them should really be obvious what they do, even though the exact statistics of how they work aren't visible. They are chosen either dependent on your alignment or taken from an imported BG1 character (where you get different ones depending on your reputation at certain points in the game). If in doubt, it's not exactly hard to find online info on D&D in general or BG2's implementation of it.

Also, start with BG1.

haha, no. BG2 is superior and there's no real plot reason to do so.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,407
Location
Copenhagen
Install BGT. Start with BG1 and play through it all. BG2 is surperior but BG1 is great as well.

Also, I brofisted a Volourn-post. I now feel dirty and must take a shower.
 

Zboj Lamignat

Arcane
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
5,540
Don't play BG1, if you do it that way I can guarantee that you'll get bored and won't finish BG2 or won't even get to it.

Also, if you're looking for tasty mage duels, inquisitor will make sure you won't see them. It's a very imba subclass and makes all mage encounters absolute cakewalk.
 

Shadenuat

Arcane
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
11,966
Location
Russia
haha, no. BG2 is superior and there's no real plot reason to do so.
If he started with BG1, he'll have to do with only a very few spells from the beginning, and he'd gradually learn which spell does what through the game. Same with class abilities.
BG2 is a sequel, a real sequel, not Mass Effect sequel, where you're supposed to know what Magic Missile does.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
14,231
haha, no. BG2 is superior and there's no real plot reason to do so.
If he started with BG1, he'll have to do with only a very few spells from the beginning, and he'd gradually learn which spell does what through the game. Same with class abilities.
BG2 is a sequel, a real sequel, not Mass Effect sequel, where you're supposed to know what Magic Missile does.

It's a boring, drawn out generic game with little of interest making up 90% of the content. Fuck everything else, being a boring game trumps any positive you can come up with.
 

Shadenuat

Arcane
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
11,966
Location
Russia
It can be finished relatively quickly if you only follow the main plot.
And for everything else, exists Icewind Dale 1.
 

SCO

Arcane
In My Safe Space
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
16,320
Shadorwun: Hong Kong
BG1 is very similar to BG2 except less 'condensed' (until the city is open anyway) - keep that in mind when people say 'it's boring'. If you install a few mods, like aurora, they get very similar (banters, etc). I don't counsel you to install npc mods except BG1 npcs though. NPC mods are where slash fanfic authors go to die.

Also, parts of it are superior to some parts of BG2, for instance, there are some alternate solutions involving the charm spell.
And Throne of Bhaal except Watcher's keep sucks. In fact, the best dungeon of the series is in the expansion of BG1, and this means you'll miss it.
 
Self-Ejected

Ulminati

Kamelåså!
Patron
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
20,317
Location
DiNMRK
Get Tutu and play BG1 in BG2 for slightly less obnoxious UI and better scaling to high resolutions.
 
Self-Ejected

Lilura

RPG Codex Dragon Lady
Joined
Feb 13, 2013
Messages
5,274
The Inquisitor is indisputably a strong class you can solo the game with, but I'm not sure if they're a good pick for a newbie because their innate Dispel ability is sort of a "lazy" way of dealing with spellcasters, you don't learn how to properly counter what these most interesting foes do, there is a whole batch of debuffing spells you'll never need to learn, you just casually drop your 2xDispel nuke and then hack the laid bare foes into pieces.
lolDispel is also a double-edged sword in that unless you judge the AoE well you'll also debuff your own party.

This is how an "epic" mage encounter works for an Inquisitor:

lolTrue Sight
lolDispel
Hack-hack-CHUNK!

They also lack most of what makes a Pally differ from a fighter, so no Lay on Hands, no Turn Undead and no lvl1-3 Cleric spells (Armor of Faith!) to cast. They can wield Carsomyr but their innate debuff still Dispels at a higher level than the sword's on-hit debuff.

For newbies who want to go "basic melee" I recommend Undead Hunter or Cav (Pally kits) or Dwarven Berserker or Barb. With the exception of stealth you have to deal with mages/dragons/supernaturals on fair ground (ie, with your own mages) but you still have some strong resistances to what negative status they can inflict on you to not be put off too much by them.

And I have to second playing BG1, though it isn't necessary to enjoying BG2.
 

Kem0sabe

Arcane
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
13,083
Location
Azores Islands
Just wait for the Enhanced Edition of BG2 before playing it, it will be so much better than the original... and you can use the mouse wheel to zoom and see Boo in all his pixelated glory!
 

Hobo Elf

Arcane
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
14,022
Location
Platypus Planet
haha, no. BG2 is superior and there's no real plot reason to do so.
If he started with BG1, he'll have to do with only a very few spells from the beginning, and he'd gradually learn which spell does what through the game. Same with class abilities.
BG2 is a sequel, a real sequel, not Mass Effect sequel, where you're supposed to know what Magic Missile does.

This. Starting out with BG2 can be overwhelming. Plus BG1 isn't as bad as some of the chumps ITT would have you think. It's the same shit but with a lower level party, so it's a matter of preference; do you like low level D&D or high level D&D? Personally I like low level parties, thus I prefer BG1 over BG2. Also, it has less OP magical items and when you do find a magical weapon or piece of equipment it feels special and important. BG2 is just munchkin hevan.
 

octavius

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
19,218
Location
Bjørgvin

desmond-tutu-un-560px.jpg
 

SCO

Arcane
In My Safe Space
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
16,320
Shadorwun: Hong Kong
Has there been a mod attempt to merge BG1+BG2? Though I guess it would be impossible but maybe with that new engine rewrite, it might be done.
That's BGT. You can't return though (it's possible to implement, but it wouldn't make any sense, obviously, and it would be a heck of a lot of work, removing all the duplicate npcs; quests pertaining thereof).

Also Bioware spectacularly fucked up with Imoen (there are about 5 different 'Imoen's in different stages of BG2), just as a example of how this sort of thing is coded in the main game; everyone knows Imoen is immortal in the first dungeon of BG2 because of story reasons, not everyone has had to deal with the pain of the horrible approach that Bioware took to code that.
The end result is that identity is not assured in IE, and thus you can't really do things that depend on it. A mod that is supposed to work in both BG1 and BG2 (and BGT by extension) needs to change most of these 'Imoen's. Making the transition back and forth seamless, would mean that scripts that refer BG1 'Imoen' would suddenly need to refer also to (most of) the BG2 'Imoen's.
 

ZagorTeNej

Arcane
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
1,980
This. Starting out with BG2 can be overwhelming. Plus BG1 isn't as bad as some of the chumps ITT would have you think. It's the same shit but with a lower level party, so it's a matter of preference; do you like low level D&D or high level D&D? Personally I like low level parties, thus I prefer BG1 over BG2. Also, it has less OP magical items and when you do find a magical weapon or piece of equipment it feels special and important. BG2 is just munchkin hevan.

Definitely, as a consequence of you tripping over uber items in BG2 (the expansion TOB is especially bad in that regard) (almost) nothing in the sequel compares to the feeling of finding a +1 magical weapon (so you don't have to carry around spare ones anymore due to plot reasons) and/or finally saving enough money to buy full plate armor in BG1, overall BG1's loot system is one of my favourite ever (along with PB games).

I also liked a semi sandbox approach BG1 had more, in addition to some small things like npcs (especially enemies) sometimes divulging extra information when they're under the effects of charm spell and having several stat checks (I remember a few charisma ones).

I also prefered Durlag's Tower over any other dungeon in the series, awesome atmosphere and encounter design.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom