Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Icewind Dale The Icewind Dale Series Thread

Heresiarch

Prophet
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
1,451
I've played all the Infinite Engine D&D stuff except IWD series, because I've heard it's pretty much hack and slash compared to BG and of course PST. Dunnoh if it's worth for a playthrough? Any good thing it has which BG doesn't? Good music? Good battles? Better art?

Is 2 based on 3rd edition? Is it better than 1?
 

octavius

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
19,662
Location
Bjørgvin
Very good music and art - better than BG.
Combat is generally better - not much of the mage duels of BG 2.
As far as dungeon crawls go it's one of the best.
Not much NPC interaction and no banters.
Class and (I think) stats do play a role in dialogues, though.
Loot is more randomized than in BG.

Definitely worth a play though.
 

octavius

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
19,662
Location
Bjørgvin
DramaticPopcorn said:
Combat is pretty much the same Infinity Engine shit.

I wouldn't call it shit, but it could have been better.
Lack of grid and no zone of control/opportunity attack is lame, though.
 

Glyphwright

Guest
No story, no characters, no point, lots of combat area filled with hundreds of monsters to kill.
 

bonescraper

Guest
It's Baldur's Gate with better music, graphics (artwise) and better atmosphere. But it's all about combat, loot and party progression. The story isn't actually that bad compared to other h&s games (but then again, you can't get more shallow than Diablo or Sacred).

I actually prefer IWD over BG. It's the mixture of music, visuals and that great fucking atmoshpere that makes these games shine.

Glyphwright said:
No story, no characters, no point, lots of combat area filled with hundreds of monsters to kill.
Sounds like Wizardry to me :lol:

Fucking storyfag.
 

Heresiarch

Prophet
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
1,451
Not much of BG2 mage duels? It's a pitty then.

I really liked those hard as fuck but insanely intense party vs party fightings, like the Twisted Rune guys and the fight getting Celestial Fury. Anything similarly challenging in IWD2?
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
4,338
Location
Bureaukratistan
Just try it? I thought it was nice and somehow always liked it better than BG2, maybe because it wasn't as epic and because it has full party generation. I also liked BG more than BG2 for similar reasons, I like the down to earth story better and it has more possible party members. Anyway, playing any of these games makes you really wish that you were playing a turn-based game instead, or at least grid-based. Maneuvering in IE games is just so damn silly.

But try it, I mean why make "should I try this game" threads anyway, usually when I hear about some game I might like I'll play it or forget about it. Considering these are old, cheap/free quickly downloaded games.
 

Nickless

Educated
Joined
Dec 16, 2009
Messages
960
I don't know about the first, but the second is awful. Just more combat, after combat, after combat, after combat, after combat, after combat. Dialogue/story essentially amounts to fetch quests in the first chapter. There's nothing to this game except poorly implemented real time infinity engine shit. Skip.
 

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
10,098
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Both are great games.

Sure, there is not much of a story, or any choices (or any consequences to choices). It does its puprose, though: it explains why you are going from dungeon to dungeon (I also count dungeons that are not underground).
But who fucking cares? It's a dungeon romp, like ToEE or Wizardry, etc.
And it definitely has the best implementation of D&D rules of all Infinity Engine games.

You into complex stories and/or c&c? Skip!
You into challenging (and it is challenging if you don't minmax) D&D combat and dungeon crawling? Play!

IWD2 is even more into those extremes. But skills, classes and races do influence the dialogues quite a lot. IWD2 and ToEE IMHO are the best dungeon crawling games using D&D rules and setting.
 

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
10,098
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Can't stand the f*cked up perspective in that game (I don't play Ultima for the same reason). Everything just looks wrong, twisted.
I envy those that can see past that, but unfortunately I can't.

Don't get me wrong, I have no doubt that it is a good game, as much praise as it gets, but I won't play it.

Also, afaik, the rules in KotC are not nearly complete, very limited class & race selection. And replayability is one of the main feats a good dungeon crawler should have.
 

soggie

Educated
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
688
Location
Tyr
Yes. Forgive the perspective, forgive the story, and just play it.

If you're a connoisseur of quality RPGs, you'll be sucked in the moment the title screen pops up. The music is fucking awesome. The atmosphere is just right.

Damn. Just play it.
 

made

Arcane
Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
5,130
Location
Germany
thesheeep said:
Can't stand the f*cked up perspective in that game (I don't play Ultima for the same reason). Everything just looks wrong, twisted.
I envy those that can see past that, but unfortunately I can't.
I never get the beef people have with that perspective. Is it because stuff is tilted to the side as well as backwards? How about Dark Sun or Albion - is that bearable?
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
3,524
I played IWD2 and it was good fun IMO. I enjoyed it more than either BG, and I would put that down particularly to the better atmosphere/music/visuals etc. The environmental sound simulation is excellent and I would say felt better than I have heard in any other game.

I didn't play it and think of it in strictly RPG terms, more of a party based action-strategy game and the combat I certainly enjoyed more than BG2, mostly due to wider range - and more interesting - enemies.

I soloed through it a second time, and had quite a bit of fun there. Recommended as an action heavy party RPG, not as some high-achieving RPG.
 
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
3,520
Heresiarch said:
Not much of BG2 mage duels? It's a pitty then.

I really liked those hard as fuck but insanely intense party vs party fightings, like the Twisted Rune guys and the fight getting Celestial Fury. Anything similarly challenging in IWD2?

The Holy Avenger fight in IWD2 is a lot like this.
 

ZbojLamignat

Educated
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
382
Demnogonis Saastuttaja said:
Just try it? I thought it was nice and somehow always liked it better than BG2, maybe because it wasn't as epic and because it has full party generation.
But BGII does have full party generation. Just start a multiplayer session, create all 6 characters, start game, save, copy the save to the single player save folder.

What's more - playing that way (with difficulty set to maximum and possibly adding some increased difficulty mods) is the way to have most fun with it. Unless you're one of those weird people that believe the party banter to be fun and romances well written.

As for the OT. I think that ID is worth it if you can stomach the IE combat mechanics and boring character system, because they're as bad as in first BG (not even character kits from BGII are there, sorry). The atmosphere and visuals are really nice, looting and difficult battles satisfying. I never liked II, the first one was simply enough for me.
 

Black_Willow

Arcane
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
1,866,285
Location
Borderline
Overweight Manatee said:
Heresiarch said:
Not much of BG2 mage duels? It's a pitty then.

I really liked those hard as fuck but insanely intense party vs party fightings, like the Twisted Rune guys and the fight getting Celestial Fury. Anything similarly challenging in IWD2?

The Holy Avenger fight in IWD2 is a lot like this.
Oh yeah, this fight was a majestic rape. I spent three days trying to beat it.
 
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
513
Icewind Dale was the only IE game I skipped back when it was released. I played IWD2, didn't like it all that much at the time and never came back to the original game. Then, a few weeks ago, I was looking for a simple but fun dungeon crawler that lends itself well to being played for short stretches between work. I got the IWD complete edition from GOG and it's hard to say whether it's because it has been such a long time since I played an IE RPG or because there have been precious few good dungeon crawlers released in between, but I'm now about halfway through the first expansion and loving it.
 

circ

Arcane
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
11,470
Location
Great Pacific Garbage Patch
IWD 2 is the only one I've tried. It chugs along decently until you get to this ice temple, with pretty much continuous unimaginative combat up to that point, then it's all downhill from there with inane puzzle after inane puzzle after that and the story going full retard.
 

chzr

Erudite
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
1,252
yes if you'd like to play dungeon crawler in infinity engine
 

Admiral jimbob

gay as all hell
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
9,225
Location
truck stops and toilet stalls
Wasteland 2
My main beef with trying this series is that Infinity Engine combat is shit. BG2 already has just about more of it than I can stand, I don't think I want to play a hack-and-slash on the same engine.
 

Phelot

Arcane
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Messages
17,908
I don't mind IE combat. Sure it's missing a lot of things that probably should be there, but I always found it to be fun. Kind of like a RTS in a way.

As others have said, the style, art, sound, and music are also a major plus if such things matter to you.
 

Shannow

Waster of Time
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,386
Location
Finnegan's Wake
IWD is a decent dungeoncrawler in the IE. IWD2 is a great dungeoncrawler in the IE.
IWD2 has some small-scale but decent C&C, decent to good dialogue, the best UI of all IE-games, 3rd ed rules (which I consider better than 2nd ed. Lack of cheese and certain spells not withstanding) and great encounter design. Many (most) battles pit you against varied enemies (eg: shaman + sorceror + 3 meleers + 2 archers). And it's far more challenging than eg. KotC. It suffers from a few bugs (music not playing, Improved Initiative doesn't work, etc) but none are game-breaking or overly bothersome.

I'd suggest both to anybody who doesn't mind IE games or dungeoncrawlers. But fuck, why do kids nowadays not simply try games instead of making threads asking whether they should try them...
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom