Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

The State of the Codex

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,469
2cwx277.jpg


We passed 1 Million hits per day in February. Now averaging 15,000 unique visits per day, with 45,000 per month. And we're chewing up a metric fuck-tonne of bandwidth while we're at it.

2mhfllx.jpg


  • All Keywords Unique Visitors
    45824 2.12% age
    40135 1.86% dragon
    35282 1.63% the
    26378 1.22% arcanum
    24850 1.15% fallout
    18033 0.83% codex
    17031 0.79% oblivion
    15783 0.73% mod
    14727 0.68% patch
    13398 0.62% penis
    11961 0.55% and
    11871 0.55% hentai
    11580 0.54% effect
    11513 0.53% alexandratou
    11510 0.53% mass
    11256 0.52% rpg
    11196 0.52% how
    10609 0.49% mods
    10320 0.48% dwarf
    10228 0.47% game
    10028 0.46% forum
    9895 0.46% fortress
    9471 0.44% sex
    9413 0.44% porn
    8799 0.41% best
    8062 0.37% for
    7844 0.36% character
    7821 0.36% divinity
    7001 0.32% play
    6853 0.32% review
    6712 0.31% build
    6706 0.31% pirates
    6649 0.31% tzoulia
    6421 0.30% alliance
    6359 0.29% space
    6203 0.29% code
    6145 0.28% julia
    6090 0.28% planescape
    5957 0.28% unlock
    5901 0.27% fate

    5894 0.27% witcher
    5780 0.27% nude
    5757 0.27% games
    5656 0.26% mount
    5653 0.26% war
    5619 0.26% jagged
    5566 0.26% map
    5445 0.25% drakensang
    5427 0.25% morrowind
    5253 0.24% mage
    5236 0.24% torment
As you can see, the old favourites are still attracting morons visitors.

State of the Decline

20f9roz.jpg


Economists are predicting further decline ahead.

dingleberry.
 

Jim Cojones

Prophet
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
2,103
Location
Przenajswietsza Rzeczpospolita
pocong? Yhis word was used only once in all history of the Codex and yet for some time it was one of the most popular search terms, most popular besides the obvious "rpgcodex" and "rpg codex"? Me doesn't understood.
 

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
Note how keywords for bad games (apart from obvious exceptions) and /gd/ topics are at the top - and for way better games - at the bottom.

Explains why decline pours through the gates so heavily.
 

VentilatorOfDoom

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
8,602
Location
Deutschland
We passed 1 Million hits per day in February. Now averaging 15,000 unique visits per day, with 45,000 per month. And we're chewing up a metric fuck-tonne of bandwidth while we're at it.

let's take entry fees, something like 2 bucks a month, we can make 50-50
 

Achilles

Arcane
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
3,425
POOPOO MCBUMFACE said:
alexandratou?

Julia Alexandratou, greek model who recently starred in a (lame) porn movie.I am baffled as to why someone would do a search on her on the codex though. The keywords "tzoulia" and "julia" are probably for her also.
 

Murk

Arcane
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
13,459
penis patch mod oblivion... trannies... hrm... there is a strange kind of logic found in this madness.

Codex truly is something else...
 

Jim Cojones

Prophet
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
2,103
Location
Przenajswietsza Rzeczpospolita
Some stupid shit is to be expected, it's obvious that there are tons of people who will find the site by googling terms like "dragon age" or "sex" and "dicks" because these searches are way more popular. What's more, it is completely irrelevant for the forum because 99% of people finding a site using google (not counting the ones who look for "rpg codex") never comes back at all or comes back once, twice.

We've got... how many regular posters? 50? 100? When you compare it with 45000 users per month it is obvious it is not a good representation of the whole userbase.

skyway said:
Explains why decline pours through the gates so heavily.
No, the decline is more connected with the fact we've got posters for whom projection game uses is more important than gameplay.
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,469
Jim Cojones said:
We've got... how many regular posters? 50? 100?
239 different user accounts have posted within the last 24 hours. 750 have posted within the last month. 1,907 within the last year.

365 different user accounts have visited the forum within the last 24 hours, 898 within the last month. 2,255 within the last year.

So about 30% of the total 7247 registered users have visited the forum within the last year.

Code:
SELECT u.username 
FROM
	POSTS_TABLE p,
	USERS_TABLE u
WHERE
	p.post_time >= 1272718097
	AND u.user_id = p.poster_id
GROUP BY p.poster_id
ORDER BY u.username

1st May >= 1272718097
Last 24 hours: 1275223697
Year: 1243774416
SQL for future my reference.
 

spekkio

Arcane
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
8,325
DarkUnderlord said:
239 different user accounts have posted within the last 24 hours.

That's probably 39 seriouz posters and 200 chefe's alts. :roll:
 

Jim Cojones

Prophet
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
2,103
Location
Przenajswietsza Rzeczpospolita
DarkUnderlord said:
Jim Cojones said:
We've got... how many regular posters? 50? 100?
239 different user accounts have posted within the last 24 hours. 750 have posted within the last month. 1,907 within the last year.

365 different user accounts have visited the forum within the last 24 hours, 898 within the last month. 2,255 within the last year.

So about 30% of the total 7247 registered users have visited the forum within the last year.
And about 1,5% of 45 000 unique users that visit the Codex per month. The calculation is far from being precise because there are various reasons why one person can browse the page from many IPs, as well as many people can use the same IP. Add to this that some of the registered users are actually an alts and it complicates even more. It is still enough to say that global statistics for search terms say nothing about the registered users.

There is a correlation because the site should be high in google with the terms that are often used in posts. At least in theory because a full analysis would require taking in account how the content is treated by google*, that these words aren't necessarily used often because many Codexers are interested in them but because of loud minority, that what is discuses doesn't really say what games Codexers are interested in playing but which ones are the most controversial/fun to bitch about...

BTW could you post how may of recently active posters joined before "the official date of Codex' death" (i.e. 28 Oct 2008) and how many of them joined later? It won't give any useful info but I'm a statistic whore** and my assburger demands it.

*we don't really know how their search engine really work, they claim it is largely based on content, experience shows it's bullshit and well chosen metatags can improve your results much more.

** I can play a game like Championship Manager for hours just looking at all the numbers without even progressing. :/
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,469
Jim Cojones said:
And about 1,5% of 45 000 unique users that visit the Codex per month. The calculation is far from being precise because there are various reasons why one person can browse the page from many IPs, as well as many people can use the same IP.
Oh, unique visitors are always visits from that IP within (typically) a half hour period. So if I visit now and come back half an hour later, that counts as two unique visits even if I'm using the same IP. Not certain if that is how our logs are actually setup but it's generally the standard measuring of unique's.

15k "unique" visitors a day could quite easily be the same 312 people visiting every half hour for a full 24 hours. It's probably fairly safe to say it represents a "real" figure anywhere from 7,000 - 12,000 though.

You'd really have to do a full analysis of the logs to work out exact numbers of unique IPs though. There are tools that let you do that but I does not have them. :( (Pretty sure they're all the kind of tools you have to pay lots of money, at least the last time I looked into it I think that's what I found).

Jim Cojones said:
It is still enough to say that global statistics for search terms say nothing about the registered users.
True.

Jim Cojones said:
There is a correlation because the site should be high in google with the terms that are often used in posts. At least in theory because a full analysis would require taking in account how the content is treated by google*
Typically links to the site count for more than words on the site itself. EG: If everyone linked to the codex as "butthurt central", then butthurt central (under google's page rank system) would be a search term that'd crop up fairly high. All the list of words really tells you is that at some point in time, someone searched for those words, found a result that included the Codex and then clicked that result and came to the codex.

Jim Cojones said:
BTW could you post how may of recently active posters joined before "the official date of Codex' death" (i.e. 28 Oct 2008) and how many of them joined later? It won't give any useful info but I'm a statistic whore** and my assburger demands it.
Yeah, I like statistics too. I'll do up a series of other graphs and things, posts per day over time and in different forums etc...
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom