Licaon_Kter
Augur
&Regdar said:I see reviewing TWitcher 2 is like talking about a dead person, in that you have to wait 40 days before you can write a negative review about it. Anyway, I guess it's a good thing Poland isn't armed with nukes. With their PM gifting a video game to a president of a foreign country (an act both unprecedented and patriotic), you know any criticism is going to inflict either denial or acute ass pain to anyone who feels any level of involvement with the game's success/failure. Which is to say, a whole fuckin' country.
Both of you, why don't you just write a review each for TW2? I'm sure the prestigiouss RPGCodex Magazine will publish it, and then only potato trolls ( or whatever the current Poland related joke is ) would run amok, as long as your insightful and detailed review handles all the good & the bad points.OldSkoolKamikaze said:Does it matter? We already know what the result will be.Licaon_Kter said:BTW, who is handling the official RPGCodex Magazine TW2 review?
Potato-eater: 11/10 bestest gaem eva!!!!!11!!
Anyone else: 5/10 meh.
'Cause this is the main problem with the OP review too, too little information in presented and then a conclusion is drawn anyway: "Oh, the PC can't jump, Oh, I have to read the journal so I know about each NPC so that's 5.5 out of 10"