Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review The Witcher - Sure is JRPG around here

Vibalist

Arcane
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
3,587
Location
Denmark
You are not funny, Andyman.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
388
Meh! Andyman's stuff is usually entertaining but this "review" just reeks of desperation and a tad too much of SERIOUSNESS!!1!!!!
 

RK47

collides like two planets pulled by gravity
Patron
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
28,396
Location
Not Here
Dead State Divinity: Original Sin
*put on Ukrainian shit is shit t-shirt*
 

Andyman Messiah

Mr. Ed-ucated
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,933
Location
Narnia
Hey, if the "glade dansk" thinks I'm boring then it must be true. :)

By the way, I gladly accept criticism so let me hear it. This one seem to have offended a lot more than the other "reviews" and I'd be interested in hearing why. Is it because I went too far or is it because of the large number of poles on the forum?
 

Andyman Messiah

Mr. Ed-ucated
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,933
Location
Narnia
Vibalist said:
Andyman Messiah said:
Vibalist said:
Shannow said:
Vibalist said:
You are not funny, Andyman.
Yes, he is.

Nope.

Yeah, well at least I am not danish!

your words they hurt me so.
Yeah, well that's the power of danecalling.

And there's nothing wrong with loving The Witcher, but please don't go around agreeing to something like "butthurt detected", man. I had no intention to rape you in the ass with this "review". What you and Geralt do when nobody's looking is nobody's but your business. Leave me out of it. Please.

Hehehe... Leave me "out" of it. Get it? Hehehe...
 

MasPingon

Arcane
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
1,919
Location
Castle Rock
idiot.jpg
 

Pseudofool

Scholar
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
202
Location
Solipsism
Andyman Messiah said:
Personally, I'd say this review is another case of burning down the forest in the interest of warming my cold feet.
Is this just snark?

I'd actually like an honest debate about what makes good writing in videogames. IMHO, too many people confuse prose style or grammatical execution for what makes writing good. Good writing comes from the subtext not from the text itself. Honestly, you cast aside the whole subtext of the game when you apeishly mistake "dark and mature" for being a matter of theme rather than tone.

What The Witcher gets right in spades is tone. It's not that it's just dark, it's complex and authentic. The characters don't simply not suck ass, they're interesting and idiosyncratic, they seem to have inner lives, and their own problems, they have secrets and they lie to others and themselves, and they do so in a way that isn't easily predictable. The world also isn't simply "mature" in the rated-r sense that you use it, and it wasn't also some convoluted world where the characters do dramatically horrible things for no reason. The politics, morality, and culture is conveyed in colorful shades of gray, that are always rooted in the real experiences of characters. All choices are bad, nearly all the characters are sneaky and dishonest, there's no glimmer of hope, and shit just keeps getting worse. Other "mature" games, say like FO, almost always use mechanisms of "hope" to fuel so much of their plot. Thankfully, the Witcher didn't resort to that. That said, I do think the romances and sex was largely bungled--those elements interrupted the immersion, and felt short-haned. The amenesia element was lame as well.

Also, I thought the journal was wonderfully thorough, and shouldn't be ignored in any analysis of the game's writing.
 

Lesifoere

Liturgist
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
4,071
Pseudofool said:
What The Witcher gets right in spades is tone. It's not that it's just dark, it's complex and authentic. The characters don't simply not suck ass, they're interesting and idiosyncratic, they seem to have inner lives, and their own problems, they have secrets and they lie to others and themselves, and they do so in a way that isn't easily predictable. The world also isn't simply "mature" in the rated-r sense that you use it, and it wasn't also some convoluted world where the characters do dramatically horrible things for no reason. The politics, morality, and culture is conveyed in colorful shades of gray, that are always rooted in the real experiences of characters. All choices are bad, nearly all the characters are sneaky and dishonest, there's no glimmer of hope, and shit just keeps getting worse. Other "mature" games, say like FO, almost always use mechanisms of "hope" to fuel so much of their plot. Thankfully, the Witcher didn't resort to that. That said, I do think the romances and sex was largely bungled--those elements interrupted the immersion, and felt short-haned. The amenesia element was lame as well.

Ah, but you've articulated why I can forgive TW's protagonist being a badass alpha male of superb fighting abilities and the inclusion of sex cards. In anything else, I'd have purged it with fire for either offense.
 

Robot

Scholar
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
823
Re: Text Filler Preference

4too said:
Text Filler Preference



Andy Messiah said:
... Alcohol helped write this ...
So in good 'spirits' may I tangentially commence ...

TANGENT

4too

Can we have the rest now?
 

Vibalist

Arcane
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
3,587
Location
Denmark
Lesifoere said:
Pseudofool said:
What The Witcher gets right in spades is tone. It's not that it's just dark, it's complex and authentic. The characters don't simply not suck ass, they're interesting and idiosyncratic, they seem to have inner lives, and their own problems, they have secrets and they lie to others and themselves, and they do so in a way that isn't easily predictable. The world also isn't simply "mature" in the rated-r sense that you use it, and it wasn't also some convoluted world where the characters do dramatically horrible things for no reason. The politics, morality, and culture is conveyed in colorful shades of gray, that are always rooted in the real experiences of characters. All choices are bad, nearly all the characters are sneaky and dishonest, there's no glimmer of hope, and shit just keeps getting worse. Other "mature" games, say like FO, almost always use mechanisms of "hope" to fuel so much of their plot. Thankfully, the Witcher didn't resort to that. That said, I do think the romances and sex was largely bungled--those elements interrupted the immersion, and felt short-haned. The amenesia element was lame as well.

Ah, but you've articulated why I can forgive TW's protagonist being a badass alpha male of superb fighting abilities and the inclusion of sex cards. In anything else, I'd have purged it with fire for either offense.

Man, what is seriously cooler than these over the top alpha male killers? This is why I love Geralt (and Riddick).
 

Pseudofool

Scholar
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
202
Location
Solipsism
Lesifoere said:
Ah, but you've articulated why I can forgive TW's protagonist being a badass alpha male of superb fighting abilities and the inclusion of sex cards. In anything else, I'd have purged it with fire for either offense.
Agreed.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom