I can bet that Obsidian and Fargo are pouring double or triple the KS sum from their own money.
No
And that wasn't VD's point, anyway. He said one million isn't enough, 3-4 million
is enough.
I didn't. I said that 3-4 is the bare minimum because I want to believe that it's the bare minimum. I quoted that interview with Feargus where he talks budgets:
"We were talking to Atari, and we started talking, and oh my god this was like the Cherokee Trail of Tears pitch," he said. "They asked in 2007 if we wanted to do Baldur's Gate 3, and I'm like 'Yes, if you guys are serious about it.' They were like, 'What do you mean?' I said, 'If you'll put a real budget behind it: it can't be $10 million, it needs to be $20 million, $25 million. If you really want to do this, then you need to put a real budget behind it. You need to give a budget that BioWare would have to do a Mass Effect or whatever. It has to be a real budget.'"
Can't help but wonder what would have happened had Feargus asked for 4 mil. Can't help but wonder why 10 mil isn't enough to make BG3 but 4 mil is more than enough to make PE.
Edit: because there is no transparency, we have no clue what the actual budget is, what's enough and what isn't. Developers ask for what they can get not what they need. So, whether or not 2, 3 or 4 mil is enough, we have no idea. For all we know:
Dave: But movies cost millions of dollars to make.
Robert K. Bowfinger: That's after gross net deduction profit percentage deferment ten percent of the nut. Cash, every movie cost $2,184.