Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

We should have the right to delete posts permanently from the server

Do you agree with the statement?


  • Total voters
    23

Ryzer

Prophet
Vatnik
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
5,218
According to the US law:
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/consumers-right-to-delete-under-us-state-privacy-laws
The CCPA provides that consumers “… have the right to request that a business delete any personal information about the consumer which the business has collected from the consumer [emphasis added].” The CPRA does not amend the wording of this right.

The VCDPA provides that consumers “… have the right to delete personal data provided by or obtained about the consumer [emphasis added].” The VCDPA’s deletion right is therefore broader than that provided by the CCPA and CPRA, in that it applies to personal information that a business has collected from a consumer or that the business has collected about a consumer from another source.
The CCPA regulations allow a business to present a consumer with the choice to delete select portions of their personal information as long as a global option to delete all personal information collected from them is also offered and more prominently presented than the other choices. The CCPA regulations also provide that a business may use a two-step process for online requests to delete, where the consumer must first submit the request to delete and then, second, separately confirm that they want their personal information deleted.

Of course there are exceptions but unless this website is a massive honeypot, it shouldn't be a problem.
 

WaterDrinker

Guest
And why exactly would you need to do that ryzer, hmmm? You haven't been engaging in certain activities involving certain anime content now have you?
 

King Crispy

Too bad I have no queen.
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
1,876,561
Location
Future Wasteland
Strap Yourselves In
You can choose to characterize the Codex as "a business" if you want to (which would likely get scoffed out of any court whether in the U.S. or Australia) but to assume that information that you voluntarily and explicitly submit on your own, as opposed to being "collected" by Codex, doesn't immediately become part of the greater common domain -- as does just about any other information that you choose to post on the internet -- is the height of stupidity.

Case dismissed.
 

Ryzer

Prophet
Vatnik
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
5,218
You can choose to characterize the Codex as "a business" if you want to (which would likely get scoffed out of any court whether in the U.S. or Australia) but to assume that information that you voluntarily and explicitly submit on your own, as opposed to being "collected" by Codex, doesn't immediately become part of the greater common domain -- as does just about any other information that you choose to post on the internet -- is the height of stupidity.

Case dismissed.
It mentions personal informations (personal includes private and public data) about an individual, not only private informations.
Even Facebook, allows to delete user's data.
 
Last edited:

Rean

Head Codexian Weeb
Patron
Joined
Nov 14, 2020
Messages
1,910
Strap Yourselves In
My info's already out there. All governments already have me branded as the cutest terrorist in the world.

noob.gif
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
They aren't collecting the information, you're providing the codex with the right to publish your work you dip.
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,343
You can choose to characterize the Codex as "a business" if you want to
Technically... it is operated as one. Kind of. That said, I don't want to get into the whole slave labour / volunteers who aren't employees but who post news thing.

The rest is potentially valid. There's a question as to who owns the content. If it's our content, or still owned by the individual who posted it. That's a quagmire.

The problem with people who permanently delete - particularly our user base - is the idiots who stir shit up, delete their own shit, then point to everyone else's shit that they stirred and say, "See, they're evil!". It's a management tool so we can actually look at things and go "Yeah, nah, you posted shit. Now fuck off".
 
Unwanted

†††

Patron
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
3,544
The rest is potentially valid. There's a question as to who owns the content. If it's our content, or still owned by the individual who posted it. That's a quagmire.
It's like in every other place; if user content benefits you, it's yours. If it hurts you, it's theirs.
 

Sukhāvatī

a.k.a. Mañjuśṛī
Patron
Joined
Jan 19, 2019
Messages
5,874
Location
འ༔ ཨ༔ ཧ༔ ཤ༔ ས༔ མ༔
You can choose to characterize the Codex as "a business" if you want to
Technically... it is operated as one. Kind of. That said, I don't want to get into the whole slave labour / volunteers who aren't employees but who post news thing.

The rest is potentially valid. There's a question as to who owns the content. If it's our content, or still owned by the individual who posted it. That's a quagmire.

The problem with people who permanently delete - particularly our user base - is the idiots who stir shit up, delete their own shit, then point to everyone else's shit that they stirred and say, "See, they're evil!". It's a management tool so we can actually look at things and go "Yeah, nah, you posted shit. Now fuck off".
FREE JARLFRANK
 
Last edited:

Kruno

Arcane
Patron
Village Idiot Zionist Agent Shitposter
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
11,478
The rest is potentially valid. There's a question as to who owns the content. If it's our content, or still owned by the individual who posted it. That's a quagmire.
It's like in every other place; if user content benefits you, it's yours. If it hurts you, it's theirs.
If you posted a threat against Joe Bidet, who is responsible, you or the Codex?
 
Unwanted

†††

Patron
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
3,544
If you posted a threat against Joe Bidet, who is responsible, you or the Codex?
You, for incitement to extremism and radicalism. I was a non radical guy before, so I'll place the blame on someone else :smug:
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom