Which of you jokers took away my Shoutbox access huh?

[saeci]

Complaining to administration wont bring your hairline back GrafvonMoltke, im sorry to say, nothing will

 

[GrafvonMoltke]

Well, I did ask you to stop.

 

[saeci]

So?

 

[Roguey]

What's your opinion on Grafvon keeping a years worth of vocaroos of Maxie and boasting about logging the entire Maxiecord in a .zip file? Isn't that... OFF SITE HARASSMENT? Hmmm? I guess all that netiquette junk is a selective thing. Huh? Huh?

Keeping that stuff and bragging about having it is weird, but I don't see how it's harassment unless he's threatening to use it against you in some specific manner.

 

[King Crispy]

Correct.

I might add that there seems to be, to borrow Jenkem's term, a coterie of people who recently seem to be adamant about:

- Mentioning this kind of thing, especially in Shoutbox
- Complaining about this kind of thing
- Belaboring their point(s) regarding this kind of thing
- Perpetuating this kind of thing
- Agitating this kind of thing

Ironic, isn't it, that the very thing Jenkem complains about -- a 'coterie' of people who in his mind are protecting certain individuals here at Codex or even protecting a certain type of people -- is actually being mirrored by an opposite 'coterie' of people who just can't seem to get enough of being the rebellious type; who just love to complain for the sake of complaining to -- I guess -- just stir up shit and make things miserable for Codex staff?

Yeah, it's almost like it's a battle between good and evil around here.

But who are the good and who are the evil?

 

[IDtenT]

I, for one, can proclaim with great pride that I have never reported anybody.

Reported for salute harvesting.

 

[Theodora]

But who are the good and who are the evil?

chaotic neutral ftw

 

[Jenkem]

Correct.

I might add that there seems to be, to borrow Jenkem's term, a coterie of people who recently seem to be adamant about:

- Mentioning this kind of thing, especially in Shoutbox
- Complaining about this kind of thing
- Belaboring their point(s) regarding this kind of thing
- Perpetuating this kind of thing
- Agitating this kind of thing

Ironic, isn't it, that the very thing Jenkem complains about -- a 'coterie' of people who in his mind are protecting certain individuals here at Codex or even protecting a certain type of people -- is actually being mirrored by an opposite 'coterie' of people who just can't seem to get enough of being the rebellious type; who just love to complain for the sake of complaining to -- I guess -- just stir up shit and make things miserable for Codex staff?

Yeah, it's almost like it's a battle between good and evil around here.

But who are the good and who are the evil?

tag me next time you talk about me you little fucking rat

 

[thesoup]

Cope, seethe, dilate.

 

[Jenkem]

yeah, that fits

 

[thesoup]

Take your HRT pills.

 

[Anonymous Wife Scholar]

your gimmick

gimmick

Hehehehehe smokes cigar and reclines in LazyBoy Ah...

*teleports behind you* No!

 

[Lady Error]

Shoutbox drama is best drama.

So why was GGS banned? And who dunnit?

 

[dacencora]

I see that the Shoutbox Purity League is hard at work.

Carry on, gentlemen.

 

[Theodora]

So why was GGS banned? And who dunnit?

Refused to stop posting a photo of Graf.

 

[Jenkem]

Shoutbox drama is best drama.

So why was GGS banned? And who dunnit?

It starts with a T.

 

[Theodora]

It starts with a T.

 

[Lady Error]

I think he means a different T?

 

[Maxie]

Sanchez will be freed eventually but m*ldcock will never cease to be an insane stalker who's breached privacy of numerous people (GGS included) then paraded with said privary around this website, which the administration has promptly ignored, but not before taunting me and mine a number of times, as a reflex - it's fine when it happens to Maxie's crowd...

to see his face around her is inexcusable

 

[Sukhāvatī]

If this site is gonna get ever increasingly cunted on at least put VD back in charge to do it properly.

 

[Skinwalker]

Maxie had well deleted that picture when Liberal kept reposting it.

Just noticed this. Liberal did not "keep reposting" shitxie's picture, he only posted it once, and he kept it inside General Discussion private forums. GGS has posted a codex member's private photo three times in this thread alone, and a fourth time on GrafvonMoltke 's wall.

GGS confirmed for slanderous liar.

 

[Turtle-Zone 3000]

It's been edited back in again

 

[Ontopoly]

I agree that it's massively pussy to make fun of what someone else looks like while hiding what you look like yourself. In my world it would be a rule that you can only call someone ugly if they have the tools to engage with you on equal footing

 

[ERYFKRAD]

I agree that it's massively pussy to make fun of what someone else looks like while hiding what you look like yourself. In my world it would be a rule that you can only call someone ugly if they have the tools to engage with you on equal footing

It's a fucking spider, of course they're ugly.

 

[Sukhāvatī]

I agree that it's massively pussy to make fun of what someone else looks like while hiding what you look like yourself. In my world it would be a rule that you can only call someone ugly if they have the tools to engage with you on equal footing

It's a fucking spider, of course they're ugly.