bonescraper
Guest
6-12 months before the release? Now that's a good oneGood, we both agree on this but then why are you judging the game 6-12 months before the release?
Fucking Blizzdrones.
6-12 months before the release? Now that's a good oneGood, we both agree on this but then why are you judging the game 6-12 months before the release?
6-12 months before the release? Now that's a good oneGood, we both agree on this but then why are you judging the game 6-12 months before the release?
Fucking Blizzdrones.
If Blizzard had any balls they'd have just outright canceled Diablo 3, knowing it's gonna suck. In the past they had the integrity do cancel projects, now they have all the money but no choices whatsoever.
I'm guessing that the projects they cancelled before did not have a guaranteed ten trillion dollar profit tag on them. We all know that no matter how shitty D3 is going to be, it will be the best selling game of the decade, so you really can't fault Blizzard for sticking to their guns on this one.If Blizzard had any balls they'd have just outright canceled Diablo 3, knowing it's gonna suck. In the past they had the integrity do cancel projects, now they have all the money but no choices whatsoever.
I've played the beta with barb, wizard and monk, found it quite good though very easy. Of course, this is act 1 on normal difficulty and it doesn't even go that far. More like up to Blood Raven in D2.Is it really that bad? I haven't played the beta. It looks pretty dire- but in a "could be fun if you liked D2" kind of way. If you played it, gush/whine about it for me, will you? I'd appreciate it.
I'm guessing that the projects they cancelled before did not have a guaranteed ten trillion dollar profit tag on them. We all know that no matter how shitty D3 is going to be, it will be the best selling game of the decade, so you really can't fault Blizzard for sticking to their guns on this one.If Blizzard had any balls they'd have just outright canceled Diablo 3, knowing it's gonna suck. In the past they had the integrity do cancel projects, now they have all the money but no choices whatsoever.
If you liked D2 you'll probably like D3. It's pretty much the same. You'll be clicking the left and right mouse buttons a lot and occasionally using 1-4 buttons for other abilities usually support/buffs things like that. I can't really say much more than that. I played the beta a couple months ago. I don't know what they've changed since then and if it works or not.Is it really that bad? I haven't played the beta. It looks pretty dire- but in a "could be fun if you liked D2" kind of way. If you played it, gush/whine about it for me, will you? I'd appreciate it.
Doesn't sound too bad.
polish
Excellent point. While the Diablo formula is incredibly simple, D1 and 2 just had something about them that makes them unique, even after a million shoddy ripoffs have been attempted. None have ever reached their level of hacky enjoyment.That's why we have so many successful Diablo clones right?
http://www.gamemechanic.co.uk/diablo-3-banned-character-names/
polish
Potatoes need to get out on the streets!
Closest game tha ever came close to D1/2's addictivness was - and now better grab onto something - Hellgate: London. Made by the former Blizzard North team, this was a lot of fun despite some wonky balance issues, but it sure as hell was better than all other Diablo clones out there, including Torchlight.
They are obviously delaying it to work out some kinks with Activision on how to get maximum profit from it.