Melcar
Arcane
How would one "antibrofist"? I guess we could call it bitchslap or something. What´s the homogay beta version of a brofist? Shit, I´m almost there baby...
How about being able to brofist (and antibrofist) posts, making it notify the poster (so they can know that someone considers their post awesome or shitty), but not displaying actual user's brofist count anywhere?
Ok, how is the system working more or less like current one, minus the counter more prone to abuse?How about being able to brofist (and antibrofist) posts, making it notify the poster (so they can know that someone considers their post awesome or shitty), but not displaying actual user's brofist count anywhere?
That's more prone to abuse (as is ALL suggestions in feedback, people forget to look at that angle first).
Well, yeah.What we really need is some kind of reward system for people that do actually post in-depth posts/promote discussion in the regular forums (I don't give a shit about GD). And it somehow not prone to abuse or bias.
If someone is in agreement with a post and they don't have anything to add, they can use the brofist feature instead of posting a one line reply. If someone is in disagreement with a post then they should at least explain why they are in disagreement and what they specifically disagree with. If someone uses an anti-brofist on one of your long posts, it'll be the equivalent of someone replying with "I disagree." I'm sure you'd be the first one to complain about this.Ok, how is the system working more or less like current one, minus the counter more prone to abuse?How about being able to brofist (and antibrofist) posts, making it notify the poster (so they can know that someone considers their post awesome or shitty), but not displaying actual user's brofist count anywhere?
That's more prone to abuse (as is ALL suggestions in feedback, people forget to look at that angle first).
Well, yeah.What we really need is some kind of reward system for people that do actually post in-depth posts/promote discussion in the regular forums (I don't give a shit about GD). And it somehow not prone to abuse or bias.
If someone is in agreement with a post and they don't have anything to add, they can use the brofist feature instead of posting a one line reply. If someone is in disagreement with a post then they should at least explain why they are in disagreement and what they specifically disagree with. If someone uses an anti-brofist on one of your long posts, it'll be the equivalent of someone replying with "I disagree." I'm sure you'd be the first one to complain about this.
I'd ignore it.If someone is in agreement with a post and they don't have anything to add, they can use the brofist feature instead of posting a one line reply. If someone is in disagreement with a post then they should at least explain why they are in disagreement and what they specifically disagree with. If someone uses an anti-brofist on one of your long posts, it'll be the equivalent of someone replying with "I disagree." I'm sure you'd be the first one to complain about this.
I still don't see the point. If someone posts something so mindbogglingly retarded then stick them on your ignore list. If it's just a one off from an otherwise sensible poster then chances are you'll read their post anyway.I'd ignore it.If someone is in agreement with a post and they don't have anything to add, they can use the brofist feature instead of posting a one line reply. If someone is in disagreement with a post then they should at least explain why they are in disagreement and what they specifically disagree with. If someone uses an anti-brofist on one of your long posts, it'll be the equivalent of someone replying with "I disagree." I'm sure you'd be the first one to complain about this.
If there was twelve or twenty, however...
The thing is that sometimes someone posts something so mindbogglingly retarded, that you don't really know where to start rebuking it. In such case a nonverbal avalanche of disapproval from everyone else, a collective implied facepalm of sorts, would drive the point home.
In any case the supply of antibrofists available to a poster should be limited to discourage using them without reason.
You need over 500 posts. At least 200 need to contain images. Seems you should post more...Hey, why can't I brofist anymore?
Save future furious flaming rages.If someone is in agreement with a post and they don't have anything to add, they can use the brofist feature instead of posting a one line reply. If someone is in disagreement with a post then they should at least explain why they are in disagreement and what they specifically disagree with. If someone uses an anti-brofist on one of your long posts, it'll be the equivalent of someone replying with "I disagree." I'm sure you'd be the first one to complain about this.
You need over 500 posts. At least 200 need to contain images. Seems you should post more...Hey, why can't I brofist anymore?
Why was GD brofisting removed? Aren't the point of brofists to decrease the spam and +1 postcount replies with brofists being an incentive to create quality posts and discussion? Given the recent concern over the quality of GD it might be worthwhile to give GD-enabled brofisting a try as an option for treating some of the symptoms of the inherent lack of that forum's calibre if we truly cannot treat the cause as the case seems to be.I still think it's bullshit that we can't give brofists in GD. Quality GD posters exist ya know...
Probably to limit the brofisting to posts about culture.Why was GD brofisting removed? Aren't the point of brofists to decrease the spam and +1 postcount replies with brofists being an incentive to create quality posts and discussion? Given the recent concern over the quality of GD it might be worthwhile to give GD-enabled brofisting a try as an option for treating some of the symptoms of the inherent lack of that forum's calibre if we truly cannot treat the cause as the case seems to be.
No you didn't.Reported Gnid for brofist harvesting.