Group conversations need to be empowered

[Grimwulf]

Glorious Raptor Overlords, hear my pledge!

We desperately require two features in group convos:
1. The men who started the convo should be able to exclude people from it. Currently he can only invite more, but once someone is invited, he can't be kicked out.
2. There should be a way to re-enter the convo after you left it, in case you are needed there again. You see, the only way to leave the group convo is to do it yourself. But once you leave the group convo, you can't be invited there again, ever.

The whole Dominions nuthouse subforum will be grateful if you fix these nano-issues.

 

[A user named cat]

Look at the Russians wanting their safe space.

 

[Grimwulf]

Look at the Russians wanting their safe space.

Yo momma's house is my safe place.

Spoiler

It's a sirius thread about sirius problems, go shitpost in GD.

 

[Darth Roxor]

Look at the Russians wanting their safe space.

an rpgcodex.ru shadow network established within the conversation areas of rpgcodex

 

[Viata]

but once someone is invited, he can't be kicked out.

Hint: don't invite stupid people.

 

[Grimwulf]

but once someone is invited, he can't be kicked out.

Hint: don't invite stupid people.

Nah, that's not the issue. In mp games alliances are established every second turn, and with each comes a separate group convo. People switch sides every now and then, so you gotta kick them out to prevent intel leaks.

 

[Sranchammer]

Seriously.

It's almost 2016, people. Evolve.

 

[Irenaeus II]

Who do you want to kick out? I'm genuinely curious.

 

[Mustawd]

Who do you want to kick out? I'm genuinely curious.

 

[The Brazilian Slaughter]

As part of the SMAC underground multiplayer community, I have no a opinion on this subject.
I agree with the OP, these are really necessary features.

an rpgcodex.ru shadow network established within the conversation areas of rpgcodex

I want a rpgcodex.pt.br shadow network established within the conversation areas of rpgcodex

its for self-defense against the
K G B
G B K
B K G

 

[Matalarata]

Who do you want to kick out? I'm genuinely curious.

Come join our exclusive Dom4 club, and you'll get to know

Spoiler

I don't know

 

[I'm Big Into Anal]

ahh faggotry central; ive come to the right place

 

[Don Peste]

No more than two Russians may gather at the Codex without permission.

 

[Irenaeus II]

No more than two Russians may gather at the Codex without permission.

I thought you were pro-KGB, as a Catalunian rebel.

 

[Don Peste]

No more than two Russians may gather at the Codex without permission.

I thought you were pro-KGB, as a Catalunian rebel.

I can't, Ichkeria Before Everything.

 

[Gnidrologist]

wtf is group convo?

 

[DraQ]

ahh faggotry central; ive come to the right place

Poos

That's quite anal of you.

 

[Unkillable Cat]

While these requests sound reasonable, be ready to ask yourselves this question: Are you willing to pay the price for them to be implemented?

Grimwulf may just get his wish fulfilled, only for him being denied access to another forum feature...or worse, the very forum feature he requested.

 

[Grimwulf]

I hate you people. It was just a feature request.

 

[DramaticPopcorn]

Welcome to Site Feedback, where feature requests come to die.

 

[ghostdog]

you should have started with: CONDUCTOR WE HAVE A PROBLEM

 

[Dreaad]

I agree with Russians Grimwulf. Giving average civilians moar power always ends well! :russia:

Spoiler

Seriously this would be a nice feature. As it is I have something like 50 conversations, as do most other turn based MP players no doubt. Would be great if we could edit existing conversations instead of starting new ones all the time.

Spoiler

At the very least give me power to enter to enter others conversations uninvited.

 

[Kane]

Good Evening.
I have been asked to interrupt my well deserved abstinence from this nuthouse to publish a comment on this very grave issue.

I fully support this product and/or service and I sincerely hope that every imaginable capacity be put into action to make user 18782Grimwulf's request reality. Little has this place needed more, especially in these times of discord and calamity, than this feature.

have something like 50 conversations

Amateur.

 

[noisenerd]

Just voicing my support for this request. It would indeed be handy for MP diplomatic shenanigans.

 

[Melcar]

Don't have conversations?