Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Neverwinter nights

pippin

Guest
When they released 7 the engine already looked dated. But there's nothing wrong with models, portraits or the backgrounds inside the buildings.
 
baturinsky

baturinsky

Arcane
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
5,537
Location
Russia
RuySan said:
bloodlover said:
You are comparing games that are many many years apart. Old graphics can look better than new ones and in many cases they do. Morrowind > Oblivion and M&M VI > M&M X are some personal examples. Oh and they did a Nwn 1 style game with updated graphics back in the day: Nwn2. And it wasn't as good as you would expect.
Click to expand...

M&M VI graphics > M&M X???

:nocountryforshitposters:

I love this series, but the 6-8 trilogy are some of the ugliest RPG's ever made. While X isn't that good looking either, it's miles more tolerable.
Click to expand...

It's amazing how nearly identical sprites looked good in HoMMIII and shit in MM6-8
 
Somberlain

Somberlain

Arcane
Zionist Agent
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
6,202
Location
Basement
6 looked like shit, 7 looked pretty good and 8 looked ok.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom