Jarpie
Arcane
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 6,610
I bet he's gonna claim that he just did it for "research purposes".
Nah, "Someone hacked my computer! Me innocent! Me swear!".
I bet he's gonna claim that he just did it for "research purposes".
Interpreting "person" in accordance with Parliament's purpose of criminalizing possession of material that poses a reasoned risk of harm to children, it seems that it should include visual works of the imagination as well as depictions of actual people. Notwithstanding the fact that 'person' in the charging section and in s. 163.1(1)(b) refers to a flesh-and-blood person, I conclude that "person" in s. 163.1(1)(a) includes both actual and imaginary human beings.
Canada has defined "person" from a legal view to prevent ambiguity in laws. Regardless, I'm going to decide "person" means something ENTIRELY DIFFERENT for this law.
Another train crash in motion?
Merely 750k for an 8 hour story-driven action-adventure game including full VO and orchestral score?
I call bullshit on this.
Time tolaunch a kickstarterfind a job at Börger King, Dyackhead.
Merely 750k for an 8 hour story-driven action-adventure game including full VO and orchestral score?
I call bullshit on this.
Time tolaunch a kickstarterfind a job at Börger King, Dyackhead.
He "has found extra funding elsewhere", according to eurogamer: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2...-kickstarter-campaign-ditches-episodic-format
Then you would be left with the rest of the team behind Too Human. Precursor really need to do a full on apology or something. Taking pride in the worst game you ever made is a pretty surefire way to make sure no one has confidence in you. Especially when you don't actually re-bunk people talking about it.Not like it matters, this shit isnt goign to get funded!!
They need a kick Denis Dyack off the team stretch goals and it might catch on