Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Filler, bunny?

Imbecile

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
1,267
Location
Bristol, England
X40c said:
@Random fantasy world generator

Ahem... Two words: Dwarf Fortress. The point of DF is to become a complex immersive and while it is not a pureblood RPG, it still has huge amounts of potential. Of course we'll have to wait till 2020 before the storytelling part actually becomes good enough to be compared with cRPGs. Then again, reading some of the player written stories, the Fortress mode is already quite immersive, even if the Adventurer mode is not up to bar. I suggest hearing some of the interviews made with Toady One, he has touch on the subject of fantasy world generation a number of times and has outlined the nature of DF 1.0 as well.

Ah yes. Boatmurdered

Sadly, I've tried Dwarf fortress, but ...*dashes tears from eyes* it was too hardcore for me.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
6,992
Imbecile said:
Now Nethack, I've played and enjoyed, but it just makes me hanker for a high production values semi-roguelike.
Prince of Qin? Like Diablo except good.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom