Introductory 2nd. Ed. AD&D modules...

[Drakron]

Grunker you ignored over 90% of what i said which rips wotc games a hole , also your come back with gurps is plain wrong and sorry wotc games titled with DND suck and it shows.

Its easy, your post was dumb.

Mechanic-wise 3rd Ed (and even 3.5) D&D is better that 2nd Ed AD&D that is a confusing mess, especially if you have access to supplements and its full of broken.

Not that 3rd Ed D&D was not without its flaws (and even more 3.5 that continued with some breaking, not I can speak since I never played outside NwN2 that hardly qualifies) but 2nd Ed AD&D?

Also dont give me that crap about it being a "smarter" system, you have THAC0 that worked THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF EVERY OTHER MECHANICS IN THE GAME! Besides dont give me that crap about encounters ... 3rd Ed was a breeze as we had tables AND customization options so the "extinction" syndrome (were the world run out of Goblins because the player outclass them and they no longer presented a threat) did not had to happen, it was a wonderful system.

Shitty documentation does not make a system smarter, 3rd D&D did throw away a lot of things (like THAC0) but at least made a solid foundation system that was wonderfully modular ... too bad Hasbro had to fuck it up.

 

[Panthera]

3rd edition is only better than the previous editions in theory, not in actual play.

 

[Carlos' Bitch1]

Don't miss a chance to play Pool of Radiance without PC, get FRC1 Ruins of Adventure.

Oh wai-, it's 1ed yet.

Really?

I was going to suggest Ruins of Adventure myself.

Still, how hard is it to just use the material in whatever ruleset you play with? It isn't rocket science.

 

[TheLostOne]

If you like less railroady modules, try the Kingmaker AP made by Pathfinder for the Pathfinder RPG (essentially D&D 3.75).