Editorial Tacticular Cancer Wants You

[Trash]

Tags: Cannon.; Fodder.; For.; Looking.

Yes, that's right. You. We're looking for a good few men, women and trannies for newsposting, reviews, interviews and all that and whatnot. If you’re interested in helping us out and join a vibrant community that may or may not want to eat your face, send Trash a pm. It's truly a magical adventure for the whole family.

 

[felipepepe]

I never got the threshold for a game to belong in TCancer... at first I thought only the most stuff, like CK, EU, Total War and Civ belonged here, but then I saw Banner Saga, Starcraft 2 and Anno 2070 being covered... do games like Final Fantasy Tactics, Disgaea, JA2, XCOM and Fallout Tactic also belong here as well?

Regardless, I think I can't apply to any position except for the weaboo land, or Jaesun would never visit such area again (even though he would probably appreciate a bit of Valkyrie Chronicle love).

 

[Trash]

Turn-based strategy? Check. Real-time Strategy? Check. Tactical Games? Check. If it involves leading teams of tiny men to murder other tiny men and take their resources, you'll find it here.

Think this says it all. Plus some of our first coverage was over games such as Warhammer: Mark of Chaos, Shattered Union, some LotR game and Civ 4.

 

[catfood]

Seeing as how I rarely play new games anymore and mostly stick to the old stuff, would it be useful to the site for me to write retrospective reviews? Or do you want the focus to be strictly on new releases?

 

[MetalCraze]

A random shitty blog at wordpress has more readers than TC - why write for something that nobody reads?

 

[Infinitron]

Seeing as how I rarely play new games anymore and mostly stick to the old stuff, would it be useful to the site for me to write retrospective reviews? Or do you want the focus to be strictly on new releases?

Everybody is always welcome to submit reviews.

 

[Kane]

A random shitty blog at wordpress has more readers than TC - why write for something that nobody reads?

so more will read it?

i'll be looking forward to a monthly column by skyway about the state of wargames.

 

[Humanity has risen!]

A random shitty blog at wordpress has more readers than TC - why write for something that nobody reads?

I don't understand why the Codex and TCancer aren't consolidated into one site.

 

[felipepepe]

i'll be looking forward to a monthly column by skyway about the state of wargames.

Skyway's monthly MASSIVE decline. I would read that.

 

[Trash]

Seeing as how I rarely play new games anymore and mostly stick to the old stuff, would it be useful to the site for me to write retrospective reviews? Or do you want the focus to be strictly on new releases?

Everybody is always welcome to submit reviews.

This times a 1000. Kick us an article and if any good we'll usually place it. Both on the 'dex and tcancer.

A random shitty blog at wordpress has more readers than TC - why write for something that nobody reads?

To get more content in place so more people are interested and we get more readers? Codex has grown massively since CB started the recent content spree. Plus hey, it's fun to write shit about games.

 

[IDtenT]

I can copy/paste news, but I'd make a terrible reviewer.

 

[Konjad]

A random shitty blog at wordpress has more readers than TC - why write for something that nobody reads?

I don't understand why the Codex and TCancer aren't consolidated into one site.

 

[fizzelopeguss]

We'd lose the prestigious T-Cancer name and front page, the rolls royce of strategy blogs.

Are you struggling trash?

 

[Trash]

Tcancer was never dead. It just smells funny.

 

[Kane]

It just smells funny.

 

[fizzelopeguss]

Tcancer was never dead. It just smells funny.

That's the stench of warnerd and neckbeard...smells like, smells like victory.