Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Recent content by consgay

  1. Baldur's Gate Baldur's Cringe 3 compilation thread

    Good short review from Lorerunner (a decent YTer imo) critiquing the bugs and weak story.
  2. Baldur's Gate Baldur's Cringe 3 compilation thread

    I'm glad I'm not alone in that. I think a narrator was unnecessary, let alone a voiced one. But it might have been an innocuous addition if done right. But they didn't do it right. Every time I'm watching gameplay footage and I hear the narrator, I get find myself irritated. Her cadence of...
  3. Baldur's Gate Baldur's Cringe 3 compilation thread

    This hits the nail on the head. RPG romance arcs should be consequential optional story beats that reveal something about the world, raise the stakes of the narrative, and help the player in their role-play. They should be intended to help the player define their character and have some...

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom