Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Silentrider
Reactions
327 677 32 5 27

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Silentrider
    Silentrider
    Firstly, most of the people who claim that in the article are Slovenes and Serbs.
    Secondly, event though such a classification makes sense in a systematic way, it is invalid in a ethnological sense since the Slovenian national indentity is quite recent when compared to Croatian.
    Silentrider
    Silentrider
    My theory is, even though I am not a linguist or historian, that Slovenian and the Kajkavian dialect are an archaic form when compared to the South slavic languages.
    An easy way to spot the evolution of the South slavic languages is to compare the map of the Ottoman empire and compare it with a map of the Kajkavian speaking territories.
    Job Creator
    Job Creator
    Sure, a lot of things shared between Slovenian and Kajkavian are retentions from the ancestral language, I just posted this because you had expressed disbelief about it before.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom