Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

rpgcodex > the threads can be improved by adding more replies

newtmonkey
newtmonkey
Finished Operencia. I didn't really care much for it at first, but enjoyed the last 50%. I liked it enough that I might replay it later with the difficulty settings turned up.
Thac0
Thac0
I liked Operencia the most out of MMX and BT4, probably because it is fairly similar to a JRPG with the fixed characters. I felt like it had the most coherent design of those three modern blobbers, BT4 pulled in different directions of radical autism and simplification, and while MMX had the best combat of the three it also had the worst everything else.
Thac0
Thac0
My final party was: Main character: Mage, Rogue with poison asphyxiation spam build, that star chick as healer and support and the blacksmith girl and her golem as a tank. So 2 aoe dps, one tank and a healer to make clearing trash effortless.
newtmonkey
newtmonkey
I actually ended up liking BT4 (DC) the best, even though it was the one I was most disappointed with at first. I did appreciate how focused Operencia is on pure dungeon crawling.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom